| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 118593 | 2011-06-12 21:56:00 | $100k-plus beneficiary homes | SKT174 (1319) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1208744 | 2011-06-13 01:42:00 | They earn much more than me, but there is a lot of them to feed at their house..... clothe, heat, etc.... makes me wonder why i bother to work so hard, maybe i should house share.........and do nothing.......less stress than my job :p i might get something done round it for a change...lol :thumbs: beetle |
beetle (243) | ||
| 1208745 | 2011-06-13 02:13:00 | The first one... 4302 / 11 = That about ~322 after tax... and that's why they wont be looking for a job....ever Compulsory work for the dole:after 6months, is the only way to sort it even if its 3 days a week sweeping the street. |
1101 (13337) | ||
| 1208746 | 2011-06-13 02:32:00 | and that's why they wont be looking for a job....ever Compulsory work for the dole:after 6months, is the only way to sort it even if its 3 days a week sweeping the street. :thumbs: Thats how you fix the unemployment problem too, plenty of jobs to do out there when you think about it |
Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 1208747 | 2011-06-13 04:44:00 | The first one . . . 4302 / 11 = That about ~322 after tax . . . The last looks terrible . . . ~171 a week after tax . Papatoetoe - 3 children and 11 adults - $4302 . 90 it's not $322, don't forget part of it is Child Allowances . |
pctek (84) | ||
| 1208748 | 2011-06-13 05:05:00 | So just to clarify, its less than that then? I agree, get them a broom. Once a month, buy them a new one. If it breaks, they have to use their forearms to sweep. Sorted! |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 1208749 | 2011-06-13 10:28:00 | so if a working couple have many children, they could just resign, wait the whatever stand down period and be financially better off :confused: | Nomad (952) | ||
| 1208750 | 2011-06-13 19:44:00 | so if a working couple have many children, they could just resign, wait the whatever stand down period and be financially better off :confused: I don't think so. It's not a fixed amount per kid, it goes down rapidly for each extra. Plus - you are (supposed to) spend the money on the kids needs. |
pctek (84) | ||
| 1208751 | 2011-06-13 22:26:00 | Yes, I know a couple on a reasonable income. They get "working for families" $$ they dont need (my words). It goes towards holidays(their words) | 1101 (13337) | ||
| 1208752 | 2011-06-13 23:13:00 | Working for families isn't a benefit its a refund on your tax. You cant receive more then you would have paid (as far as I'm aware though it could be I just made that fact up) As much as I think its a bureaucratic nightmare (Labour sucks arse) I don't believe its the governments role to screw people over in the pursuit of tax. I'm on a reasonable income, we "receive" working for families and every cent is sucked into the budget. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1208753 | 2011-06-14 12:18:00 | TOP 10 BENEFIT PAYMENTS Where - How many - How much per week * Papatoetoe - 3 children and 11 adults - $4302.90 * Avondale - 10 children and 6 adults - $2999.74 * Manukau - 8 adults - $2852.82 * Unknown rural - 6 children and 9 adults - $2500.24 * Kelston - 8 adults - $2462.95 * Tauranga - 5 children and 8 adults - $2479.36 * Kaitaia - 1 child and 9 adults - $2479.36 * Manurewa - 7 children and 7 adults - $2429.20 * Glendene - 3 children and 8 adults - $2326.63 * Mangere - 11 children and 7 adults - $2295.73 www.nzherald.co.nz No wonder they don't want to work Six of those ten are South Auckland. And South Aucklanders wonder why South Auckland has a bad rep. :stare: :groan: |
johcar (6283) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||