| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 121623 | 2011-11-03 06:38:00 | USB3 | Cicero (40) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1241608 | 2011-11-04 04:25:00 | i watch a video usb 3 was only two times as fast tested usb three mboard with a ssd hd to avoid the hd bottleneck, not ten times as fast as the guy said quoting the theory speeds. typing on hand phone. | Nomad (952) | ||
| 1241609 | 2011-11-04 04:41:00 | Hard drives arent fast enough for USB 3 anyway, they barely can max out USB2 They can't even max out their own SATA 3Gbit/s... |
pcuser42 (130) | ||
| 1241610 | 2011-11-04 04:46:00 | They can't even max out their own SATA 3Gbit/s... Haha yeah we need a massive increase in tech here, even our internet will be faster if they dont hurry up |
Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 1241611 | 2011-11-04 04:50:00 | In terms of efficiency . I tested a single largish file . My 54Mbit/sec WIFI worked out to be around a 20Mbit . My 2000 era old laptop that is still tickling away, well at the time, the LAN port just died :p it was performing at maybe 80Mbit for a 100Mbit . For routers, many people I guess just use WIFI . For us we just don't copy that much stuff, it's just internet and stuff . But for backup, we just click start and leave it, sync or incremental doesn't take that long . Well there are SSD HDs . . . :D But most won't buy them for the price . But then again there are SATA 3 HDs with a 6Gb/sec channel . Inefficiencies . . . It's not like going from USB1 to 2 . . . . . . |
Nomad (952) | ||
| 1241612 | 2011-11-04 05:37:00 | In terms of efficiency. It's not like going from USB1 to 2...... Yes, rather sad, that is what I was hoping for, why? I know not. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1241613 | 2011-11-04 06:28:00 | I don't know what the fuss is about. I've striven mightily and with the various ages of 'puter around here only USB 1 lives up to it's specs. Even pushing with both feet, I can't get more than 1 plug in. |
R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1241614 | 2011-11-04 06:58:00 | I don't know what the fuss is about. I've striven mightily and with the various ages of 'puter around here only USB 1 lives up to it's specs. Even pushing with both feet, I can't get more than 1 plug in. Unreal Rx, your mind really goes to some different places than anyone elses its scarey! but....i still want to have a beer with you one day (writes it on his bucket list!) or two |
Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 1241615 | 2011-11-04 07:08:00 | Unreal Rx, your mind really goes to some different places than anyone elses its scarey! but....i still want to have a beer with you one day (writes it on his bucket list!) or two Not sure they allow visitors where RX hangs out. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1241616 | 2011-11-04 07:40:00 | haha you are invited to Cic :thumbs: | Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 1241617 | 2011-11-04 08:16:00 | Well I just did some tests :D I have with me a SATA 2 HD in the PC. I copied a single large file 1.8GB to a internal HD using a external dock. Destination Seagate SATA 2 - 29.74sec Seagate SATA 1 - 31.41sec. This was using eSATA on my PC. USB2 was 1m 03.58 and 1m 04.34 respectively. :p So what SATA2 :lol: USB 2 took quite some seconds at the end to finalised. |
Nomad (952) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||