| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 8586 | 2001-04-05 23:29:00 | Norton System Doctor / System Monitor | Guest (0) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 10908 | 2001-04-05 23:29:00 | Hi, Norton System Doctor tells me my CPU usage is say 9% while Win98 System Monitor says 21%. Overall theres a big difference and I can't get them to read the same even with adjusting the sample time and actual/decaying value.They do seem to read simular at higher values, but Nortons drops back down to 2-5% while System Monitor sits around 23%.Which one do I believe? Thanks |
Guest (0) | ||
| 10909 | 2001-04-06 12:12:00 | well win98 says the value is approx. i wouldnt trust either. nortons is known to 'test/report' things a little inaccurate and win98 plainly says it is. unless you are having problems i wouldn't use either as it is another app chewing up resoruces. |
Guest (0) | ||
| 1 | |||||