Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 122457 2011-12-22 00:38:00 5 year old attacked ... WTF is going on in this country SP8's (9836) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1250147 2011-12-28 07:31:00 And his family will call across the court room: "we love you son", "hang in there bro" and the media will suck it up.

The silly little prick didn't realise that it would be his own DNA that would finally catch him.
Zippity (58)
1250148 2011-12-28 07:34:00 what will he get?

4 years?

:(
Slap on the hand with a wet bus ticket because of his age.
mikebartnz (21)
1250149 2011-12-28 07:43:00 And his family will call across the court room: "we love you son", "hang in there bro" and the media will suck it up.

The silly little prick didn't realise that it would be his own DNA that would finally catch him.
That "hang in there bro" shows your bias but because of his age it is unlikely that we will truly know who he is.
mikebartnz (21)
1250150 2011-12-28 08:25:00 I had a perhaps unreasonable suspicion when they showed that news piece a while back with the young guy who was "first on the scene" and was commenting how awful it was and how he saw the mother holding the girl and stuff.

Watched too many Crime Channel docos perhaps but there have been rather a few cases on those where the perpetrator was helping in searches and stuff and then turns out to be the one.

I kept thinking, why is this young local guy first on the scene? Do locals hang about at motor camps? Do they just randomly wander by? Why would he have been there?

Probably not this guy at all, but he was young......they didn't show his face as I remember. I'm perhaps just a suspicious person but I wonder.......
pctek (84)
1250151 2011-12-28 09:22:00 That "hang in there bro" shows your bias but because of his age it is unlikely that we will truly know who he is.

Are you naive or just being obtuse?
Zippity (58)
1250152 2011-12-28 10:28:00 Are you naive or just being obtuse?
Probably just as well you edited that post as I don't consider myself an idiot and I'm not naive but I also don't run around jumping to stupid conclusions all the time either.
mikebartnz (21)
1250153 2011-12-28 12:06:00 Probably just as well you edited that post as I don't consider myself an idiot and I'm not naive but I also don't run around jumping to stupid conclusions all the time either.

Maybe in time we shall know if he is right. I have a feeling he is correct in his assumption.
Cato (6936)
1250154 2011-12-28 12:31:00 Maybe in time we shall know if he is right. I have a feeling he is correct in his assumption.
I won't deny there is a chance he will be right but several have jumped to what has since been proved to be the wrong conclusions so far. Bit of a pointless game in my opinion and so often the ones that are quick to jump to conclusions are incorrect.
mikebartnz (21)
1250155 2011-12-28 12:41:00 I am afraid given his age, and the sentiment stirred up by his crime, we will never know anything about him. And assumptions are all we have for the moment. Cato (6936)
1250156 2011-12-28 18:14:00 Probably not to hard to guess who his lawyer is likely to be. Also easy to guess the defense case. Abused background et al. If we are really lucky he will be one of the very few who get sorted and never offend again but a lot more likely nothing much will happen to him now and he will be back before the system again for a similar crime in the future. CliveM (6007)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19