| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 10225 | 2001-07-12 06:38:00 | Win2k System State, should I have deleted it? | Guest (0) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 15410 | 2001-07-12 06:38:00 | Hi, On my Win2k system, about 2months now since upgrading from Win98, I knew that System State was to revert to the 'state' my PC was last saved using this feature. Since this upgrade I did a System State once I had converted to Win2k. Even with some problems I was still encounting due to hardware compatibility issues! When these issues were resolved I used the System State to realize the changes I had implemented. Back then I didn't know that the size of the file was continuing to grow until I decided that (couple days ago) since all my compatible issues and all have been resolved since, I anticipated in thinking I should delete the one I first started out with and make a new one. The only thing I saw was that my 1st System State had grew to a 950mb in size. Now, the new one which I had done recently is about 227mb. I want to know was this a good idea? If not, can you explain why it wasn't! Im pretty nervous, that I hope Ive havent done something potentially dangerous! Cheers |
Guest (0) | ||
| 15411 | 2001-07-12 23:13:00 | hi, the only time I have ever seen 'system state' in W2K is in the backup utility. If you are using something different, I'd like to know how to get to it. If it is this option, then you've not done anything bad, just create a new one using 'ntbackup' It's not likely to be a leftover from your 98 OS is it? |
Guest (0) | ||
| 15412 | 2001-07-13 08:21:00 | Hi, Ah yes it is the Backup utilite of Win2k. Well, Im not sure if it was a left over from 98. But even moreso, does it matter? I used the 2nd System State without having any errors on my new Win2k System. Thanks for your input Anon! |
Guest (0) | ||
| 1 | |||||