Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 123515 2012-02-29 20:35:00 Hello!? Who gives a ^%$@??? Zippity (58) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1262349 2012-03-01 22:48:00 Taking it up the bum is wrong! It is morally unacceptable and very unnatural. While I agree with you, I'm not so sure it is so unnatural. Rams in a paddock together will shag each other , I think bulls do also. I also remember watching some Doco once about some monkeys in Asia I think where the males used to arse shag the other males and females of the group, it seemed to be more of a fun sport than anything to do with dominance. Maybe someone subjected the monkeys to a porn movie... dunno, but there you go. I guess there are others as well, might be a bit of a prick for hedgehogs though. Iantech (16386)
1262350 2012-03-01 22:49:00 No this is better. www.youtube.com
BTW I'm a Queen fan also.
:)

Oh yeah!! one of there best
Gobe1 (6290)
1262351 2012-03-01 22:53:00 Here is another Gay.
www.youtube.com
:lol:
Trev (427)
1262352 2012-03-01 23:01:00 While I agree with you, I'm not so sure it is so unnatural. Rams in a paddock together will shag each other , I think bulls do also. I also remember watching some Doco once about some monkeys in Asia I think where the males used to arse shag the other males and females of the group, it seemed to be more of a fun sport than anything to do with dominance. Maybe someone subjected the monkeys to a porn movie... dunno, but there you go. I guess there are others as well, might be a bit of a prick for hedgehogs though.

Saw this (or something much like it) recently somewhere: "Homosexuality exists in 450 species, homophobia in just one - which one is unnatural?"

Not sure if 450 is accurate but the general gist of it seems to make sense to me.
Agent_24 (57)
1262353 2012-03-01 23:12:00 Saw this (or something much like it) recently somewhere: "Homosexuality exists in 450 species, homophobia in just one - which one is unnatural?"

Not sure if 450 is accurate but the general gist of it seems to make sense to me.

I hope you are not one of them AG, but if you must, do use a good lubricant.
Cicero (40)
1262354 2012-03-01 23:23:00 Let me see if I understand this correctly.

If the animals can do it, then it must be OK.

How silly of me not to understand that :)
Zippity (58)
1262355 2012-03-02 00:04:00 I hope you are not one of them AG, but if you must, do use a good lubricant.

Not that I know of :lol:

I just don't see any reason to hate them for it. If two people are happy together it shouldn't matter. They are both consenting and they aren't hurting anyone else. What's the problem in that? Even if it was abnormal it's not as if it's doing any harm to me or anyone else, so I don't care.


Let me see if I understand this correctly.

If the animals can do it, then it must be OK.

How silly of me not to understand that :)

I think the point of that quote (if correct) is to say that if so many different species do it, then maybe it's not as abnormal as some people might think.
Agent_24 (57)
1262356 2012-03-02 00:04:00 Another "cop out" reply :(

Does your condoning the practise make it any more right?

No actually it is not a "cop out" reply.
I am fully in support of people living their lives as they wish, if that includes taking the hershey highway then each to their own.
DeSade (984)
1262357 2012-03-02 00:27:00 Perhaps those who see gays as evil,unclean,unatural are the ones with the real problem.
Bigots can allways find a way to justify their beliefs ; they cant however come up with any rational, non-emotive arguments.
1101 (13337)
1262358 2012-03-02 00:34:00 yet youre all hypocrites because you dont mind lesbians??? Gobe1 (6290)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8