| Post ID |
Timestamp |
Content |
User |
| 1273350 |
2012-05-02 21:21:00 |
here ( www.electronista.com) |
stratex5 (16685) |
| 1273351 |
2012-05-02 21:38:00 |
Wonder how many megabytes a 42MP photo is :p |
pcuser42 (130) |
| 1273352 |
2012-05-02 22:12:00 |
Wonder how many megabytes a 42MP photo is :p
web.forret.com |
johcar (6283) |
| 1273353 |
2012-05-03 01:48:00 |
The whole my cam,era has more megapixels than yours thing is ridiculous, friend was looking at buying a camera with 20MP until I pointed out that if all they are going to do is look at the results on a normal PC screen then3MP is enough, it's not like they are going to be printing A3 or bigger pictures |
gary67 (56) |
| 1273354 |
2012-05-03 03:50:00 |
I can print A3 off my 6MP camera, LOL. When I was studying I in a photo shop and it had a picture of a tiger, 3MP Sony Cybershot captured that. Probably a A2 or so ... |
Nomad (952) |
| 1273355 |
2012-05-03 05:06:00 |
Yeah i really dont get the whole point in 41MP thats overkill for anybody and plus most photographers use DSLR. |
stratex5 (16685) |
| 1273356 |
2012-05-03 06:35:00 |
More MP don't mean diddly sqaut if the image sensor is small and low quality (it's where you get those grainy, speckled low light photo's from on P&Shoot cams and if the optic system is bad. Mega pixles count for something but consumers are suckers for huge ass MP ratings |
The Error Guy (14052) |
| 1273357 |
2012-05-03 06:39:00 |
I have been scanning film (the professional ones that was used and still is used for wedding portrait skin tones) and it has more grain than digital generally speaking. Even with the points and shoots the grain probably won't be an issue once you make the common print sizes. Prior to digital, did many people scan their film at outrageous resolution and zoom into it 100% ..... |
Nomad (952) |
| 1 |
|