Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 22413 2002-07-20 13:01:00 some www.echoecho.com statistics a bit out of date? E.ric (351) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
63869 2002-07-20 13:01:00 Some screen resolutions at my web site I have had
240 * 320 (a new toy or a old computer with core memory)
640 * 480
768 * 1024
800 * 600
960 * 720
1024 * 768
1152 * 864
1280 * 1024
1600 * 1200
3072 * 768 (someone has a wide screen monitor)

but at echoecho they only have.
52% 800x600
34% 1024x768
03% 640x480
03% 1280x1024
03% 1152x864
<1% 1600x1200 		E.ric (351)
63870 2002-07-21 04:19:00 "240*320" ? that must be a new toy, with a portrait screen. The IBM CGA resolution is 320*200.

And the only resolutions which core memory computers knew about were 80 and 132. That's how wide (in characters) the screen on your terminal was. Those were the "resolutions" of most of the real computers with dynamic semiconductor memory, too. Those buggers with 132 upset everyone else, because their emails had to be reformatted in an editor to make them readable. I still say that the best format for transfering information from one computer to another is the 80 column card format. (Preferably with no characters after field 72). 		Graham L (2)
1