Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 149453	2020-12-24 06:08:00	Info On The Boeing 737 MAX	zqwerty (97)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
1474019	2020-12-26 09:47:00	Air Canada Boeing 737-8 MAX suffers left-hand engine fault on return to service flight: www.aviation24.be Corporations are only worried about one thing, profits to payout stock investors, I can't understand why you would believe anything they say, especially Boeing after the takeover and an obvious consequence which has led to them having to promote a cover-up.	zqwerty (97)
1474020	2020-12-26 19:56:00	The Boeing 737 Max is safe to fly in, the chances of you being in an accident in one is so low to be incalculable. But how would I know I was only an aircraft technician then aircraft engineer for 27 years.	prefect (6291)
1474021	2020-12-26 21:41:00	Air Canada Boeing 737-8 MAX suffers left-hand engine fault on return to service flight: www.aviation24.be Corporations are only worried about one thing, profits to payout stock investors, I can't understand why you would believe anything they say, especially Boeing after the takeover and an obvious consequence which has led to them having to promote a cover-up. why do you keep pushing the idea that the 737max is a faulty aircraft. your about 1 year to late. its been fixed, its been approved, its being rolled out. for for what you say to be true then every single aviation authority around the world must be in the boeings pocket. tens of thousands of people that would need bribing. and that NSB, FAA and their overseas counterparts are all idiots that don't understand planes. engine faults do happen on all aircraft. that why they have well trained pilots to do the right thing. i noticed you didn't mention the recent Antonov An-124 that blew the fan section on takeoff and crash landed or the light plane that had engine failure and landed on a motorway in-between cars.	tweak'e (69)
1474022	2020-12-26 21:43:00	The Boeing 737 Max is safe to fly in, the chances of you being in an accident in one is so low to be incalculable. But how would I know I was only an aircraft technician then aircraft engineer for 27 years. how many people died in car accidents during the lockdown? far more dangerous driving than it is flying.	tweak'e (69)
1474023	2020-12-26 21:51:00	The circumstances surrounding Boeing have changed, it is no longer the company it once was. The proven air-frame of the decades old 737 has been compromised by the addition of a too-large engine necessitating an incorrect mounting position on the plane causing the plane to climb into a stall, this tendency has been offset by badly designed and executed software and known to be unreliable sensors. All this info has been documented and illustrated in the previous entries and links in this thread. Google it yourself don't believe me.	zqwerty (97)
1474024	2020-12-26 21:54:00	Google is wrong then.	prefect (6291)
1474025	2020-12-26 22:32:00	The circumstances surrounding Boeing have changed, it is no longer the company it once was. The proven air-frame of the decades old 737 has been compromised by the addition of a too-large engine necessitating an incorrect mounting position on the plane causing the plane to climb into a stall, this tendency has been offset by badly designed and executed software and known to be unreliable sensors. All this info has been documented and illustrated in the previous entries and links in this thread. Google it yourself don't believe me. all your info is coming from media sources which are sensationalising issues and are giving out false information. have you actually bothered to look at the actual crash reports and the FAA reports? we regularly get this issue with my industry. nz media don't fact check their stories and they report complete BS, which suckers people in. meanwhile the real issues don't get reported as real life is just to darn boring.	tweak'e (69)
1474026	2020-12-26 22:40:00	I read and studied these crashes right from the beginning, at first it was a mystery as to why they had failed in such a drastic way as if they were riding a huge hidden roller-coaster in the sky as the pilots pulled the plane up to normal flying height only to have it nose dive again. You are taking as gospel the words from the very people/corporation who designed the f-up in the first place, of course they are going to say it's ok they want to get back to business as usual. To them penalties and fines are just operating costs.	zqwerty (97)
1474027	2020-12-26 22:50:00	I read and studied these crashes right from the beginning, at first it was a mystery as to why they had failed in such a drastic way as if they were riding a huge hidden roller-coaster in the sky as the pilots pulled the plane up to normal flying height only to have it nose dive again. You are taking as gospel the words from the very people/corporation who designed the f-up in the first place, of course they are going to say it's ok they want to get back to business as usual. To them penalties and fines are just operating costs. so what your saying is the NSB, FAA and all their counterparts across the globe are all paid off by Boeing.	tweak'e (69)
1474028	2020-12-26 23:07:00	They are bamboozled by Boeing propaganda and working with a proven flawed aircraft attempting to make it right with more kludges disguised as solutions. Just as you and others on this site are doing, taking Boeing as a substitute for god, so are the regulatory authorities who have a tendency to focus on details and ignore the overall big picture of a plane that was wrongly conceived from the word go with too large engines mounted into an unsuitable air-frame years out of date with the competition in an effort to compete with Airbus. These facts are not in dispute all that is lacking is a judgement that this is completely the wrong approach that Boeing has taken to save money and they needed to design a new aircraft from the ground up in order to compete with the Airbus 320. DOH, WAKE UP.	zqwerty (97)
1 2 3 4