| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 125415 | 2012-06-26 22:37:00 | More Racism and Separatism: | B.M. (505) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1284152 | 2012-06-30 00:36:00 | Typical racist BS - and you're supposed to be a moderator. Lol the most racist anti white, pro criminal rights person in the history of internet posting. Hello pot. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1284153 | 2012-06-30 00:38:00 | +1. In fact, the Maori cleared even more bush than the settlers did. They built their Pa on top of a hill, the cleared all the nearby bush so attackers couldn't hide in it. There were a lot of Pa's, and so a lot of the bush was cleared by the Maori. And their talk about protecting native birds is also BS. They didn't care about keeping a viable population of animals and birds. They bought rats, pigs, dogs et all with them, which greatly harmed some species, and hunted others to extinction (the Moa being a fine example). The Canterbury plains are a result of the bush burning they did early on. The carbon dating of the stumps is around 1450. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1284154 | 2012-06-30 00:58:00 | The Canterbury plains are a result of the bush burning they did early on. The carbon dating of the stumps is around 1450. Exactly! And now they bang on about 'us' causing the damage. |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1284155 | 2012-06-30 00:58:00 | Myth, of course no one here was around then, but there is a lot of scientific, historical and archaeological evidence out there. You also want to listen to some of the old Maori stories handed down over the generations. Mike, that makes a lot of sence, you may well be right there. |
Iantech (16386) | ||
| 1284156 | 2012-06-30 01:43:00 | What a pile of rocks that would have taken a few hours to assemble is proof of a higher civilization? I have seen these so embargoed my ass. Im sure there are many people who have seen the rocks and many people that could locate them. So what exactly is embargoed or restricted until 2063? Seems odd to me too. However, if you click the Feedback link on the site, there is some interesting reading from people all over the world. Might provide more questions than answers but I would still like to know if this restriction, or embargo business until 2063 is correct and if so why? :confused: |
B.M. (505) | ||
| 1284157 | 2012-06-30 06:11:00 | Christ there are some clowns out there. How you can extrapolate a pile of rocks into a Beehive House" hovel dwelling from mediaeval times amazes the pants off me. No wonder the Nigerian internet fraudsters are doing a roaring trade on dumb as dirt Westerners. There is one born everyday. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1284158 | 2012-06-30 06:37:00 | Christ there are some clowns out there. How you can extrapolate a pile of rocks into a Beehive House" hovel dwelling from mediaeval times amazes the pants off me. No wonder the Nigerian internet fraudsters are doing a roaring trade on dumb as dirt Westerners. There is one born everyday. That's all very well and good, but why would the Goverment declare the information about the matter secret until 2063??? No matter how I try I can't think of one good reason. Even 2063 seems a strange date. But HERE (tvnz.co.nz)'s another finding that won't please some. Using DNA, radio carbon and computer simulations, Victoria University scientist Adele Whyte of Ngati Kahungunu descent, has worked out that 190 women were in that last push to New Zealand. And there were probably more men, suggesting more than seven waka were used. "That proves it wasn't an accident. It was definitely a planned settlement. They bought plants and animals with them, that's not a fishing trip blown off course. "It blows out of the water any theories that Maori got here by accident," Whyte says. "Whenever I go onto a marae, the first thing people ask is what is your iwi. I guess this study is like an extension of this. Finding out who our family is... who our cousins out there in the Pacific." This Indigenous People theory seems to me to be getting further off course.:lol: |
B.M. (505) | ||
| 1284159 | 2012-06-30 08:04:00 | What you replied to wasn't racist at all but you like running around labelling everyone a racist.:groan: I will ask you again. Have you ever personally been invited onto a marae and by that I don't mean as part of your work. Your question is irrelevant to the issue but yes I have. You'd have to be blind to see that this forum is used as a platform for racist viewpoints. Chilling Silence does nothing about it and consistently appears to support the comments of those that do. You talk about Maori as if a whole race shares the same viewpoints and characteristics, but then get incredibly upset when someone returns the favour and calls you Pakeha. Why this obsession with things Maori?. If you don't support stolen land being compensated for then we got your point about ten years ago, but the majority continues to vote for Governments that do. I know democracy doesn't suit you extremists but recent Governments support resolving injustices and all the racist threads you want to start won't change that. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 1284160 | 2012-06-30 08:08:00 | Lol the most racist anti white, pro criminal rights person in the history of internet posting. Hello pot. Gee thanks - high praise indeed from a rampant redneck like yourself - but you were always honest at least unlike some of the others on here. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 1284161 | 2012-06-30 08:17:00 | HERE (www.celticnz.co.nz) maybe? WAIPOUA FOREST STRUCTURES. "The following photos of dilapidated structures were taken on 11th November 2000. These are a few examples of registered structures, designated as purpose built by archaeologists, which were mapped by position, described and recorded for posterity. The information derived was considered so sensitive that it was then labelled "restricted" and not to be viewed by the general public until the year 2063". Why the embargo????????? :confused: According to this article (see p.8) the embargo was lifted in 1996......and there is nothing significant in the original report. www.openureyes.org.nz |
martynz (5445) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | |||||