| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 125830 | 2012-07-22 02:13:00 | Which is more evil ? | globe (11482) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1289999 | 2012-07-23 09:52:00 | Yeah, Thats right up there with downing women for witchcraft, burning heretics, and building an entire system so to supply children to pedophiles. Of course, we would all go to jail for that as well. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1290000 | 2012-07-23 10:20:00 | As I recall that was unintended acquisition by google. When I see bills on my credit card statements for 'Android app development' or something I'll be worried. Till then, not so much. | 8ftmetalhaed (14526) | ||
| 1290001 | 2012-07-23 11:32:00 | I think Microsoft should get a special mention, it is not there yet. But is trying hard to copy Apples Evil plan for world domination. I wonder if Apple has patented their Plan and can sue them. | McRuff (12291) | ||
| 1290002 | 2012-07-23 12:51:00 | I would pick Google, because I don't use Farcebook. Google recently bought and then killed off Meebo messenger which was the best web IM client available. Also, they like to go around saying "Don't be evil" which is just a complete joke. |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 1290003 | 2012-07-23 20:24:00 | If the title was "Witch is more evil", I would agree, And more evil than everything, but still the Jonkey makes her a Minister. It's hard sitting here, perfect in every way, watching the little people blundering about. ;) |
R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1290004 | 2012-07-24 00:34:00 | Facebook for me and Blizzard for making a game online access even for single player :arrrgh: | Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 1290005 | 2012-07-24 23:30:00 | Lets see, what company took there little cars around the world & 'listened in' on every unsecured wifi signal they could find, collecting private data. I think if you or I tried that we'd risk jail-time. If anyone is dumb enough not to secure their network if they don't intend it to be open they only have themselves to blame. Wouldn't it be great if all wireless networks were open. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1290006 | 2012-07-24 23:34:00 | If anyone is dumb enough not to secure their network if they don't intend it to be open they only have themselves to blame. Wouldn't it be great if all wireless networks were open. Damn right, and if anyone steals from your house its your fault for not welding steel plate over the windows. When will honest people understand that they are in the wrong for the dishonest unethical actions of others? |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1290007 | 2012-07-25 00:07:00 | Yeah, some people don't actually understand that WiFi even needs security... | Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 1290008 | 2012-07-25 01:39:00 | True, however it's like saying that you're responsible for walking past somebody in a cafe and overhearing them talking about confidential figures. It's piss easy to setup a Wifi card in promiscuous mode and just have it dump pcaps of everything to analyze it all later. Also, anybody seen this before? It's quite funny, the very thing a corporation once stood against, is the very thing they've become the embodiment of: www.youtube.com |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |||||