Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 126038 2012-08-03 06:57:00 The climate study to end them all martynz (5445) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1292551 2012-08-04 07:48:00 The point is that the climate has always changed, we have merely flourished in recent times as a species as we have had tiny tiny tiny window where the earths climate has allowed us to breed in high numbers and feed ourselves, when those conditions change then some other species more adapted for the new conditions will be the dominant species and will breed in high numbers...

This is the cycle.

People have such small minds to think that the end of mankind is the end of the world, They are not the same.

It doesn't matter how much money is wasted, or what the species does, the cycle isn't affected nor will it stop.
Metla (12)
1292552 2012-08-04 08:04:00 The point is that the climate has always changed, we have merely flourished in recent times as a species as we have had tiny tiny tiny window where the earths climate has allowed us to breed in high numbers and feed ourselves, when those conditions change then some other species more adapted for the new conditions will be the dominant species and will breed in high numbers...

This is the cycle.

People have such small minds to think that the end of mankind is the end of the world, They are not the same.

It doesn't matter how much money is wasted, or what the species does, the cycle isn't affected nor will it stop.

Ah yes, despite clear Consensus by the majority of experts people still think they know better. Key words, consensus, experts and majority.
globe (11482)
1292553 2012-08-04 08:11:00 I give them all about the same level of credibility that I reserve for you.

The [edited].

If these fools think they can control the cycles of the earth then they are also misguided and delusional, No matter how much money they make on the issue.
Metla (12)
1292554 2012-08-04 08:27:00 If these fools think they can control the cycles of the earth then they are also misguided and delusional, No matter how much money they make on the issue.

Clearly they do not think they can control global cycles,
and clearly they are not in it for the money.

They all agree we are having an impact on the natural cycles and the impact is not a positive one
globe (11482)
1292555 2012-08-04 08:36:00 really?

So the measures being put in place all around the world aren't to combat global warming, wait, I mean climate change?

pfffftttt.

More fool you, research is run on money, and the scientific community run where the money takes them.
Metla (12)
1292556 2012-08-04 09:02:00 research is run on money, and the scientific community run where the money takes them.

I can assure you those with the advantages to be gained from it being disproven have much deeper pockets, as the link I posted above demonstrates
globe (11482)
1292557 2012-08-04 09:15:00 Ah . . . clear Consensus by the majority of . . .
The system that is used and recommended to give us Rodney Hyde, John Banks and in fact the ( ?)hole parliamentary bowl of porridge . Also firmly espoused by Lemmings (but not hereditarily) . My full opinion is coming via Swiss Post . ;)
R2x1 (4628)
1292558 2012-08-04 09:28:00 I can assure you those with the advantages to be gained from it being disproven have much deeper pockets, as the link I posted above demonstrates

Yeah right, Like I care about your links enough to see what they are.

If you ever reach a level of credibility that means I'd actually take real notice of your views I'd be surprised.
Metla (12)
1292559 2012-08-04 09:31:00 I would study the climate too if I had a long ladder and a paycheck to match gary67 (56)
1292560 2012-08-04 10:03:00 If people will just accept the cheapest climate they can find, they can expect it to be a bit wobbly
The deluxe climate is a far steadier proposition, ring now to inquire.
R2x1 (4628)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9