Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 26671 2002-11-02 04:25:00 CD-R nzchrise (1180) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
95397 2002-11-02 04:25:00 Is there any diffrence between (a) CD-R s used for data backup purposes and (b) those marked 'CD-R Audio' for creating music cd s?

Is the Audo CD-R a more specificly designed item?

TIA for any help
Chris
nzchrise (1180)
95398 2002-11-02 04:31:00 > Is there any diffrence between (a) CD-R s used for
> data backup purposes and (b) those marked 'CD-R
> Audio' for creating music cd s?
>
> Is the Audo CD-R a more specificly designed item?
>
u answered ur own qusetion. :D CD-R discs are meant for any standard type of data files. Most CD-R's with audio data when played in stereo's won't work, so thus there are Audio CD-R's which are designed mainly for audio data and will work with most standard stereo players. In all it (Audio CD-R) has a higher chance of compatability with stereo players.

cheers,
v.K
vk_dre (195)
95399 2002-11-02 04:48:00 Where did you get that info from vk

A blank CDR is a blank CDR....... Its how & what format you burn it at, is what gives it its playability.
Baldy (26)
95400 2002-11-02 05:34:00 The Audio CD-Rs are more expensive as they include royalties paid to record companies.

With most stand-alone CD recorders, like the ones built into a midi-system have to use the Audio CD-Rs
-=JM=- (16)
95401 2002-11-02 11:17:00 I have an 8yo Alpine head unit and 6cd stacker which plays standard CD-Rs just fine.. SoniKalien (792)
95402 2002-11-02 21:49:00 > A blank CDR is a blank CDR....... Its how & what
> format you burn it at, is what gives it its
> playability.

No duh. look, u burn a cdr with audio data into an audio cd format, now play it in cd players (not new ones, but the older models) now it won't work. Why? The information being burnt onto the cdr disc is standard iso format. Now burn the same audio tracks onto a specifically designed Audio CDR, then play it on a cd player (not new, but older models) now it will work. Why? Because the information being burnt onto the audio cdr is standard audio iso format. Now compare the two, wot results do u end up with. Now as per my first post, it is a clear concise conclusion from wot i have posted here. Why don't u try it urself? and by cd player i mean discman, cd/stereo player, models before 2001. Some models before 2001 will be able to read the normal audio data from a cdr and will have compatability issues with certain cdr discs. I hope i made myself clear now.

v.K
vk_dre (195)
95403 2002-11-02 23:18:00 That's a new one.

An audio CD is the same format no matter what medium you use. There's only one type of audio CD. ISO is a data type.

AFAIK an 'Audio CD-R' has a different dye in the substrate.
SoniKalien (792)
95404 2002-11-02 23:36:00 > That's a new one.

sssh! Don't tell anyone!.:D

> An audio CD is the same format no matter what medium
> you use. There's only one type of audio CD. ISO is a
> data type.

Of course it is. All of my replies are just generalisations.

> AFAIK an 'Audio CD-R' has a different dye in the
> substrate.

So. It has a diff dye, now try the experiment and see the results that u get. and of course ISO is the only format, wot i mean is that this ISO is concerned with audio data. There is no audio ISO format, it just a generalisation. I don't need to get techy. I just posted my results from an experiment i conducted.:)
vk_dre (195)
95405 2002-11-03 02:02:00 The lovely thing about standards is the way people keep "improving" on them.

You are all right, and you all get a prize.

The 20 year old CD standard is meant so that music publishing companies and audio equipment manufacturers can sell CDs which will play on CD players. :D

The assumption was that CDs would be produced by stamping pits into a clear polycarbonate, then adding a (metal) reflecting layer (usually aluminium). This gives a usable contrast betwen pit/no pit., and the players were built to use these standard disks.

Then CDs were recognised as being a very good way of distributing computer data. The basic technology remained the same. Still fine. Then people made equipment for directly writing CDs one at a time. It takes a bit more energy to write pits into metal films, and there are other problems, so the writable disks had a dye layer instead of a metal one. Various manufacturers used different dyes. These give different contrast ratios for pit/no pit. Remember that some CD-R, and CD-RW disks can't be read on computer CD ROM drives ... that's a contrast problem.

People started writing their own audio CDs. The same problem. Some audio CD players have "never" been able to play audio CDs written on computers. Some CD players have been able to play "some" of them.

These "Audio CD-R" disks have probably got a dye chosen to be nearest to the contrast ratio of "metal" audio CDs. (They still might not be playable on "touchy" audio players). If you need them you need them. If you don't, you don't. B-)
Graham L (2)
95406 2002-11-03 02:49:00 Thanks for the replys.

I figured that a CD-R Audio would be more 'specific' and backward compatible on older players.

Just saving $2 or $3 to check it out. :)
nzchrise (1180)
1 2