Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 26818 2002-11-06 01:33:00 802.11a wireless networking JLeader (594) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
96443 2002-11-06 01:33:00 Personally I have yet to see anyone using 802.11a wireless networking here in NZ.
Is this just a cost or marketing thing or is there some other reason that it has been so slow here ?
I believe that I can get an 802.11a AP and a dual band PCMCIA card here quite quickly (I'm favoring Netgear's brand at the moment).
Would anyone at the magazine be interested in testing and evaluating them for the magazine if I obtain them ??
JLeader (594)
96444 2002-11-06 01:42:00 Perhaps it's the lack of speed available in wireless networks? The greatest speed I've seen for wireless LAN is 22Mbps, and that's only for a short distance, using new 22Mbps technology... mostly wireless LANs tend to run at around 2-4Mbps, which is on the slow side, considering most LANs would run at 100Mbit, and now as high as 1000Mbit.

>>> Would anyone at the magazine be interested in testing and
>>> evaluating them for the magazine if I obtain them ??

You'd probably need to email somebody at the magazine to get an answer to this :) or perhaps Robo or Bruce might be interested.

Mike.
Mike (15)
96445 2002-11-06 01:51:00 >> considering most LANs would run at 100Mbit, and now as high as 1000Mbit

Woops - that should read "and now as high as 10000Mbit" (10 Gbit)

Mike.
Mike (15)
96446 2002-11-06 07:40:00 Thanks but I think you are thinking of 802.11b.
802.11a and the still developing 802.11g (a sort of multiplexed 802.11b) can easily go fast enough for surfing etc.
JLeader (594)
96447 2002-11-06 07:47:00 So you're just talking about it with regards to home networks then? Far too expensive for what little it offers IMHO.

Mike.
Mike (15)
96448 2002-11-06 07:54:00 It is expensive, but prices are dropping.

I'd advise you to wait a while.

Read Chris K's column about it in this months PCW!
Chilling_Silence (9)
96449 2002-11-06 07:57:00 >>> Thanks but I think you are thinking of 802.11b.

Why do you think that?

Mike.
Mike (15)
1