Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 30630 2003-02-26 02:26:00 XP and DOS Thomas01 (317) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
123980 2003-02-26 21:01:00 Chill, too true, good on you :) Terry Porritt (14)
123981 2003-02-27 01:38:00 > But then you are still a child . . . .

Yes, only 16 . :O

Imagine the potential this teenager has got . . . . . and a lot of the other teenagers here . We are very fortunate to have them as regulars on this forum as they are full of enthusiasm as well as very generous with their knowledge when they have the time .

Don't knock that confidence and enthusiasm out of them . Encourage it .
Susan B (19)
123982 2003-02-27 01:49:00 I thought he was referring to godfather. -=JM=- (16)
123983 2003-02-27 01:58:00 I've got a good 486DX2-66 with 8MB ram, running DOS 6.22 and W3.11. Can I run an XP emulator under DOS so I can run the new games? :D ]:) Graham L (2)
123984 2003-02-27 02:17:00 > I thought he was referring to godfather.

You did? :O

Hmmm, maybe he was! :^O
Susan B (19)
123985 2003-02-27 03:11:00 > I've got a good 486DX2-66 with 8MB ram, running DOS
> 6.22 and W3.11. Can I run an XP emulator under DOS
> so I can run the new games? :D ]:)


Dude, you gotta have 64MB RAM to install it, so you may needa buy/borrow some and then install XP. When you're done, feel free to go back to 8MB, while remembering it'll be using Swap file for almost everything! ]:) ;-)
Chilling_Silence (9)
123986 2003-02-27 04:25:00 Trying to second guess?

Maybe I was . . . . .


But then again - maybe I wasn't


Regardless - all of you missed the point

try tots
Merlin (503)
123987 2003-02-27 04:36:00 If you really want to be hyperpedantic, the first MS OS to not have a DOS underlay was DOS. Graham L (2)
123988 2003-02-27 09:10:00 > If you really want to be hyperpedantic, the first MS
> OS to not have a DOS underlay was DOS.

I'm going to remember that one Graham.
-=JM=- (16)
123989 2003-02-27 10:14:00 You really shouldn't take things personally - it leads to places that get hot Merlin (503)
1 2 3