| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 30773 | 2003-03-02 09:46:00 | Static RAM | sc0ut (2899) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 125068 | 2003-03-02 10:44:00 | mmmmm....i must be getting rusty here ;-) remind me not to answer post late at nite :| | tweak'e (174) | ||
| 125069 | 2003-03-02 11:37:00 | That site you gave isn't very up to date as it didn't give any info on double data rate ram. | mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 125070 | 2003-03-02 12:01:00 | yea it does www.webopedia.com if you type ddr it gives you "Dial-on-Demand Routing" but lower down it has a link to "DDR-SDRAM" |
sc0ut (2899) | ||
| 125071 | 2003-03-02 20:18:00 | You are so right. I hadn't scrolled down the page far enough. If you go on to read the bit in Tom's Hardware you will probably give rdram a miss as it is basically a dead duck now. Intel are giving up on rdram and going for ddr ram. | mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 125072 | 2003-03-03 03:00:00 | I've got two boards of static RAM: one has 8k bytes, the other has 4k. That is "k", not "M". They cost about $250-$350 in the late 70s, for kits. It's expensive (still) because it uses transistor flipflops, not capacitors. No refresh required, which made it go faster than dynamic. |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 125073 | 2003-03-03 03:35:00 | Auction it on Ebay Graham;\ Caveat Emptor ;) Could make you rich :^O Cheers Billy 8-{) :D |
Billy T (70) | ||
| 125074 | 2003-03-03 03:42:00 | What was fast then might not be a top seller these days: I think the 8k one has 16 250ns 2114s on it. The 4k has 32 2102s, I think it was slower. | Graham L (2) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||