| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 31297 | 2003-03-17 23:09:00 | OT: presidental Speech at 1... | csinclair83 (200) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 128991 | 2003-03-18 02:36:00 | mmm i'm sooo mad...the most pathetic (well he talks crap)..speech...and it wasnt even subtitled(i'm deaf)....i cant beleive it....am jsut trying to find something on cnn.com when they usually put full words of his speechs on... usually when theres something important on live..they subtitle it..like princess diana's death a few years back...technology wasnt that advanced compared to now..and grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr... 2 days for him 2 get out? did they give him a place 2 go?..or do they wanna lose him like they lost bin laden..if he ever exists... |
csinclair83 (200) | ||
| 128992 | 2003-03-18 02:38:00 | Well, that would have knocked the monocle from many a plutocrats eye that night. I wonder if Bush will make up any more amusing words during his speech? I'm at work, so I've already missed the pep-talk. Oh well. |
Jemy_X (2081) | ||
| 128993 | 2003-03-18 02:42:00 | if u have net access newhere..with realplayer... watch the debate at parliament (nz) on their urgent debate for the war... dont know if tis on tv...but on the net..free onenews.nzoom.com enjoy :) |
csinclair83 (200) | ||
| 128994 | 2003-03-18 02:45:00 | Surely if the US attack Iraq without the backing of the United Nations Bush himself might be tried for war crimes. Does this not occur to him? | Oxie (1318) | ||
| 128995 | 2003-03-18 02:48:00 | that was mentioned by someone sometime on the news... i'm wanting that to happen...but who would ahve the guts to arrest and do that to the president...i mean..hes human like us...but yeah...coz the UN havent got ne guts to actually say "NO" to war...they like negioate..blah...and we havent got guts to say no..we just say its the last restort..when it shouldnt have been a restort at all...and australia has given them troops..with the whole country against it..... |
csinclair83 (200) | ||
| 128996 | 2003-03-18 03:12:00 | > Surely if the US attack Iraq without the backing of > the United Nations Bush himself might be tried for > war crimes. Does this not occur to him? Now why would that happen? Just because he's starting a war/fighting a war without the backing of the UN does not mean he's committing any crimes of war - those crimes could take place during the war, but the war itself would not make him guilty of war crimes. Mike. |
Mike (15) | ||
| 128997 | 2003-03-18 03:48:00 | Oxie, History is writen by wars "winners". Only "war crimes" commited by those whose team "lost" lead to trail. .Clueless |
Clueless (181) | ||
| 128998 | 2003-03-18 03:52:00 | There is a partial transcript here (www.cnn.com) for those that missed it (yes, me included - I was too busy *working*!) | honeylaser (814) | ||
| 128999 | 2003-03-18 04:17:00 | I think a few people might be eating Naive Cereal for breakfast! If you decide to delve further, you may discover that the media has been doing a fine job, since the U.N. was founded in 1945, of painting this establishment with the "peace organisation" brush - a palette of many colours. It is well known that the U.N. is a front for the international bankers. | Dyan (2333) | ||
| 129000 | 2003-03-18 04:29:00 | Ho Oxie Bush and his US of A team are not signatories to the War Crimes guff. As far as I understand, the cannot be charged. The simpletons from Britain and Australia who are going in to fight with/for Bush are signatories and could end up being subjected to the W/C charges. Scouse. |
Scouse (83) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | |||||