| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 31923 | 2003-04-04 08:32:00 | Best Defrag for xp? | dumb-bell (3303) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 133334 | 2003-04-05 13:39:00 | >>As for older defrags never moved system files or swap files, I haven't yet within my experience (I stand corrected) found any utility that can do this for you. I'm pretty sure Norton's Speed Disk did just that |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 133335 | 2003-04-05 21:57:00 | I recon winXP defrag is good, look at the results I got www.clanswat.orcon.net.nz | TiM©:*) (977) | ||
| 133336 | 2003-04-05 22:58:00 | You won't get that result on a NTFS drive, I use VoptXP V7, it has a lot of handy utils bundled with it. | Dak2 (1963) | ||
| 133337 | 2003-04-06 05:08:00 | mine never looks like that Tim... what did you do to get that? My XP defrag lines are usually all over the place different colours n'all! Trev |
Trev0 (1995) | ||
| 133338 | 2003-04-11 06:52:00 | > mine never looks like that Tim... what did you do to > get that? My XP defrag lines are usually all over the > place different colours n'all! > > Trev Ahh, It really isnt that good, that drive is my biggest 17.7gigs, and in the bar, it shows in ratio or that ever so, blah blah blah, and that drive is where all my games are installed, so it doesnt change much, hahah |
TiM©:*) (977) | ||
| 133339 | 2003-04-11 09:03:00 | > The built in version in XP seems to do a fine job, I > am not sure you would gain anything with a third > party application? godfather is right it is better to use he built in version in XP. |
stu140103 (137) | ||
| 133340 | 2003-04-11 09:04:00 | Ok..ok.. You can somehow look like this: sal.neoburn.net Defrag.gif if your using NTFS. Not as easy as FAT32 systems. |
The Student (3269) | ||
| 133341 | 2003-04-11 12:18:00 | Why? | mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 133342 | 2003-04-12 00:41:00 | The Student: Why do you have so many little partitions? If you don't mind me asking. :-) I always thought each partition hogged a fair bit of hard drive space to write the FAT (or whatever it is) so the more you have, the more space is wasted. Unless I have got it all wrong, of course. |
Susan B (19) | ||
| 133343 | 2003-04-12 04:18:00 | how come the link has a 20% or somehting | TiM©:*) (977) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||