| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 33889 | 2003-05-28 19:51:00 | OT guess what I am doing now | E.ric (351) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 148211 | 2003-06-01 02:02:00 | > Why don't you just leave the TV off, or get rid of it > if you find TV1,2,3,4 so ruddy obnoxious. Ther is no > obligation to switch your TV on. Go read a book or > whatever, doh > > The TV set dosen't switch on by itself. Come on > as an observer, I assumed he was being dismissive of the dross dished up for his viewing. That is why I said he didn't need to switch the "ruddy" TV on. Okay Joe, justify it as you will, but that's not the way you used the words I highlighted, and why bother to post such a critical response anyway. It was E.ric's business not yours, you could have chosen to endorse his view of television programming quality by simply saying you agreed and had switched yours off. From my perspective you took an unwarranted hook at another poster, which I in turn pointed out fairly politely as being (IMHO) unnecessarily aggressive. Nuff said. Cheers Billy 8-{) :| |
Billy T (70) | ||
| 148212 | 2003-06-01 02:39:00 | > EXTERMINATE !! EXTERMINATE !! EXTERMINATE !! EXTERMINATE !! > EXTERMINATE !! EXTERMINATE !! EXTERMINATE !! EXTERMINATE !! >sky customers. >>rom my perspective you took an unwarranted hook at another poster, >>which I in turn pointed out fairly politely as being (IMHO) unnecessarily >>aggressive. Nuff said. I presume E.ric,you are referring to this kind of stuff,that is not nice. |
Thomas (1820) | ||
| 148213 | 2003-06-01 05:41:00 | Dalek fan Thomas, relax. Most people over 20 know about Doctor Who, it has been showing on TV again recently :D Cheers Billy 8-{) [b][pre]If you dig, you'll find dirt. :| |
Billy T (70) | ||
| 148214 | 2003-06-01 06:17:00 | > > Why don't you just leave the TV off, or get rid of > it > > if you find TV1,2,3,4 so ruddy obnoxious. Ther is > no > > obligation to switch your TV on. Go read a book or > > whatever, doh > > > > The TV set dosen't switch on by itself. Come on > > > > as an observer, I assumed he was being > dismissive of the dross dished up for his viewing. > That is why I said he didn't need to switch the > "ruddy" TV on. > > > Okay Joe, justify it as you will, but that's not the > way you used the words I highlighted, and why bother > to post such a critical response anyway. It was > E.ric's business not yours, you could have chosen to > endorse his view of television programming quality by > simply saying you agreed and had switched yours off. > > From my perspective you took an unwarranted hook at > another poster, which I in turn pointed out fairly > politely as being (IMHO) unnecessarily aggressive. > Nuff said. > > Cheers > > Billy 8-{) :| > > I preferred it when you were the original Billy T James |
Joe_Bloggs (3863) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||