Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 33924 2003-05-30 00:18:00 OT: Does anyone else think that's a ghastly portrait? Billy T (70) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
148443 2003-05-30 00:18:00 Saw the portrait of Hillary in the Herald this morning and was a bit shaken by the apparent license used by the artist. :O

I'm no art connoisseur, and I accept that portraits in oils are not "photographic" studies, but I thought it should at least look like the man.?:|

Maybe we shouldn't have used an Aussie artist :(

Cheers

Billy 8-{) :|
Billy T (70)
148444 2003-05-30 00:44:00 It doesn't even look like him! It makes him appear overweight and older than he actually is. Don't know why they commissioned an Aussie "artist" to do it - it isn't as if we don't have any talented artists in this country. I do hope he doesn't pretend he likes it when he sees it. honeylaser (814)
148445 2003-05-30 01:33:00 It's quite lifeless, there is no twinkle in the eyes, that's not really Ed. Terry Porritt (14)
148446 2003-05-30 03:34:00 The art critics will tell us how good it is,I mean these sods tell us Colin Mccan or whatever is name is ,was good!! Thomas (1820)
148447 2003-05-30 04:43:00 I didn't like it when I saw it on TV, and thought he looked really grumpy, which is not like Sir Ed (at least in public).

However, his daughter in law seemed quite enthusiastic - she said she liked the way this big man was crammed into a little frame, and how he seemed to be trying to burst out (or something to that effect). If the artist was trying to convey that this man is bigger than life, then maybe that is some sort of achievement.

I still think he looks a grumpy old man, crammed into a tiny frame...
John H (8)
148448 2003-05-30 09:30:00 If you saw the photos on the back of the NZ Herald - he always came across well and very vital with a wide open grin and definitely with a side profile - front profile and closed mouth is not the same !!
Not very recognisable. Disappointing !!!!
Misty
:( :( :(
Misty (368)
1