| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 34758 | 2003-06-23 05:08:00 | "Hacking" Hotmail Accounts | somebody (208) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 154410 | 2003-06-25 21:42:00 | By cracker friendly, I think it is meant better to crack from than more popular for attempting to crack machines that are running... Linux gives the user much more control over kernel and administrative settings enabling the user huge amounts of power in comparison to that which Microsoft entrusts to the user. Iain |
Iain Walmsley (3372) | ||
| 154411 | 2003-06-26 07:06:00 | Precisely what I meant, Iain. It's very hard for me to see just how mikebartnz interpretted that I meant Linux was more prone to cracking... the term "cracker-friendly" usually means that something or someone is friendly to those who are described in the first part. In this case, that is crackers. If I had meant Linux was more prone to being cracked, I would have said "cracker-prone". |
agent (30) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||