| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 128073 | 2012-12-02 04:18:00 | Poll: Elections every four years or three years? | Digby (677) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1315870 | 2012-12-02 04:18:00 | On Q and A this morning one of the ideas to get NZ moving along was to extend the term of parliamnet to 4 years. What do you think 3 or 4 years ? |
Digby (677) | ||
| 1315871 | 2012-12-02 04:23:00 | 4 years would be too long if the commie parties were in power and 3 years is too short for a National party government | prefect (6291) | ||
| 1315872 | 2012-12-02 04:35:00 | Should have none as a choice. | QW. (15883) | ||
| 1315873 | 2012-12-02 04:39:00 | Yes I did think about Digby as president as an option...or BM or Jen or Kim Dot Com | Digby (677) | ||
| 1315874 | 2012-12-02 05:03:00 | I voted 4, but I'd like to see a US system where one PM can only get two terms. | Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1315875 | 2012-12-02 05:09:00 | Seem's like on Q&A there was a general consensus on 3 years being to short Braid was right with 3 years to short |
Lawrence (2987) | ||
| 1315876 | 2012-12-02 05:32:00 | 4 years far to long when Labour in. So 3 it is on the off chance. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1315877 | 2012-12-02 06:16:00 | So, we see yet again, the right-wrong, bemoaning the chance that a representative, peoples government might get a longer term? Spare me, from these hypocritical dreamers. The only way to benefit from a single regime is to have it for a long time. Four years is not enough, a 5 year plan is in order! Followed by several more...:p |
KarameaDave (15222) | ||
| 1315878 | 2012-12-02 07:03:00 | ^ @KarameaDave I did think about adding a 5 year option, but I thought it best to keep it simple. |
Digby (677) | ||
| 1315879 | 2012-12-02 08:43:00 | What the devil has the country done wrong enough to merit an extra year of the pathetic pile we have lollygagging around in Bellamys? | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||