| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 35694 | 2003-07-19 06:49:00 | Xtra phone numbers | heni72847 (1166) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 161100 | 2003-07-20 00:40:00 | > I would have thought the difference in the Xtra > numbers is that one ended with 0 and the other 2 Duh! WE'd be troubled if we couldn't tell. ;-) But as far as I'm aware, they should be the same thing. Hey, I wonder *could someone test it out if possible, I haven't got dialup* could you switch from one number to the next when one of them is "busy"? If it speeds things up, somebody should really notify Xtra, as they shouldn't be doing this, disadvantaging people who don't know about this. |
~~~~~ s y ~~~~~ (2054) | ||
| 161101 | 2003-07-20 00:51:00 | This was covered the other day in a reply by Peter Coleman. They both point to the same place. Some time ago they went to a different (slower?) modem pool for compatability. Not now. |
godfather (25) | ||
| 161102 | 2003-07-20 02:12:00 | > Apple shaped Thomas being Xtra, I thought it would have gone pear-shaped .... ahhhhh, low blow lol J :D |
Jester (13) | ||
| 161103 | 2003-07-20 10:14:00 | werid though.... i seem to get connected faster with the 303032 compared to the 303030 |
heni72847 (1166) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||