| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 36207 | 2003-08-03 02:17:00 | P.C. WORLD | JJJJJ (528) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 164981 | 2003-08-06 03:53:00 | What no thread needs is personal abuse. Just stop it. | Graham L (2) | ||
| 164982 | 2003-08-06 05:05:00 | You are one sad case Agent.... | Kibito (623) | ||
| 164983 | 2003-08-06 05:17:00 | > And most have much tighter control on what you can > and cannot do, how much involvement the moderator is > going to have in your post. There's allways a flip > side. Please give me some examples for what I can do in Press F1 that I won't be allowed to do so in those "tighter forums"? I don't feel the "tighter control" in those forums, nor the moderator steps in everynow and then. I'm sure what you can do in PressF1 you can also do it in those so called "tighter control" forums if not more. :) Cheers |
SKT174 (1319) | ||
| 164984 | 2003-08-06 05:33:00 | JUST STOP IT. Read Bruce's posting about behaviour. If you want to slang off each other go and do it somewhere else. The alt.flame and other similar news groups are made for it. This is not. |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 164985 | 2003-08-06 05:43:00 | Err.. ?:| i was just talking about various forums, wasn't slanging off each other :( |
SKT174 (1319) | ||
| 164986 | 2003-08-06 06:04:00 | I've really had enough of the attitudes in here. | agent (30) | ||
| 164987 | 2003-08-06 07:02:00 | I have to agree with GL, although I don't think you need to feel that he was directing his advice specifically at you SKT, and I certainly did not take offence with your comments re the forums . I had a look at the sites you posted, if they adhere to their posting policy then, the forums would be based on a tighter control than PF1 . Having said that however, the only one I have visited before is the OC NZ forum and I have never posted there . I would offer the opinion that the majority of posts on OC NZ would be considered very OT on PF1 and seem to go nowwhere fast at times, but I also don't doubt the knowledge of many of the posters and they certainly exhibit alot of freedom . I still don't like the idea of an edit option for PF1, as I think it has the potential to add to careless behaviour . A 360 on my thoughts before I visited those sites but, now for different reasons :D Cheers Murray P |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 164988 | 2003-08-06 07:22:00 | I kinda agree with you, i always read pc world magazine but i am kinda sick with all those cameras and stuff, they should be on the FWDD magazine, i'm more looking forward to articles about software and hardware, not really cameras and cellphones and all those communication stuff. I love the section on games, that's one of the only things i'm looking forward to read in pc world magazine. So maybe try to improve it a bit!!! regards |
attaboy999 (3517) | ||
| 164989 | 2003-08-06 07:37:00 | >I still don't like the idea of an edit option for PF1 Yes, I can understand it does have it Pros & Cons. Actually, have or not have edit function doesn't worry me at all. As I usually read my msg twice before hitting the post or submit button :) Cheers Murray |
SKT174 (1319) | ||
| 164990 | 2003-08-06 07:49:00 | Last time I went out my front door, it was a FREE world. If you think that PCWorld has too many adverts, articles on cameras, DVD players or whatever equipment you don't like, and there is very little in the magazine by way of PC equipment thats of interest DON'T BUY IT. Personally, for me it has an excellent mix, but we are all different. |
Baldy (26) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | |||||