| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 36499 | 2003-08-12 00:01:00 | Who is NT Authority\System and Why does he restart my PC? | Chilling_Silently (228) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 166954 | 2003-08-12 13:04:00 | Hii, I dont think i have got it yet but not sure on it. i got a message from sygate saying a file was trying to access internet.. and i clicked on "do not allow" When i look under security logs in Syagte Firewall, it says: "08/12/2003 23:08:01 Executable File Change Denied Major Outgoing TCP 216.187.107.31 0.0.0.0 E:\Program Files\Internet Optimizer\optimize.exe 1 08/12/2003 23:07:59 08/12/2003 23:07:59" Thsi is showing under logs for Sygate Is this file related to the virus or is it just a case of spyware or if its normal and part of IE 6.0 Cheers |
neptune (3819) | ||
| 166955 | 2003-08-12 13:40:00 | Why don't you use GETRIGHT!!!! if its stopping your download b4 it finishes | PoWa (203) | ||
| 166956 | 2003-08-12 13:49:00 | Just cleaned it off my dads computer. The latest AVG update picks it up. Ironically, since he only uses the computer for email he probably got infected while downloading the virus update. Going back tomorrow because AVG doesn't remove everything. And to patch & install a firewall. |
bmason (508) | ||
| 166957 | 2003-08-12 13:54:00 | Because over 90% of the people here would have to download GetRight.. now how big is the installer's EXE? Its just adding to the stress, hence why splitting it up, or temp. removing the virus is a good solution.. or even permanently removing it :D |
Chilling_Silently (228) | ||
| 166958 | 2003-08-12 14:46:00 | Yer but all 56k users should have a copy of getright, first point of call. How can you do without it? argh! :) | PoWa (203) | ||
| 166959 | 2003-08-12 22:36:00 | Just curious... why 32 and not 64? | Greg S (201) | ||
| 166960 | 2003-08-12 22:38:00 | > Ironically, since he only uses the computer for email > he probably got infected while downloading the virus > update. haha! > & install a firewall. Good man! |
Greg S (201) | ||
| 166961 | 2003-08-13 00:59:00 | > Just curious... why 32 and not 64? Because you dont have a 64Bit processor do you :-) |
Chilling_Silently (228) | ||
| 166962 | 2003-08-13 03:19:00 | I decided to do a bit of digging around about all this and it somewhat interesting what I found. It may be possible to use a program called Dcomcnfg.exe in 2000 to disable the DCom functions long enough to update as well as the other ways posted. www.uksecurityonline.com And these are interesting just if you want to know more about DCom and US reaction etc. cexx.org support.cox.net nsit.uchicago.edu www.outpostfirewall.com www.iss.net It would appear from some of this that fixing this permanently might just be a problem and port 135 might have to be blocked permanently online eventually. I wonder if any particular people would benefit from port 135 being blocked worldwide permanently? (I am old conspiracy nut so take no notice of that :D ) And this is an explanation of how to deal with it with pretty pictures to show all. www.f-secure.com |
John Grieve (367) | ||
| 166963 | 2003-08-13 07:18:00 | so this doesnt affect anyone below XP/2000? excellent, thank you bill gates (hes still a fag) |
Beef (1415) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |||||