| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 37822 | 2003-09-19 03:07:00 | OT- Research shows | Steve Askew (119) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 176358 | 2003-09-19 03:07:00 | Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig, huh? |
Steve Askew (119) | ||
| 176359 | 2003-09-19 03:10:00 | It's not quite that amazing any more ;) | -=JM=- (16) | ||
| 176360 | 2003-09-19 03:44:00 | > It's not quite that amazing any more ;) Why not? ?:| |
Steve Askew (119) | ||
| 176361 | 2003-09-19 03:58:00 | Coz it's already been talked about here on PressF1 :) | caffy (2665) | ||
| 176362 | 2003-09-19 05:12:00 | Yes, but no one on PressF1 has researched how pissed off we can get over spelling... I read Askew's post without any trouble, which can only prove two things: the research is right, or I'm not good at spell checking (but I'm excellent at spelling). |
agent (30) | ||
| 1 | |||||