Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 38249 2003-10-01 12:18:00 Internet connection sharing perelini (4629) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
179597 2003-10-01 12:18:00 Can you have internet connection sharing with win98 (not SE version)
with Win ME?
perelini (4629)
179598 2003-10-01 12:30:00 Only if WinME is doing the Sharing of the internet.

Win98 can be a client.. So could Win95 for that matter.

You only need Win98SE or newer to Share the internet connection :-)
Chilling_Silently (228)
179599 2003-10-02 06:54:00 What you are looking for is a proxy.

A good free proxy is availble from Analogx (http://www.analogx.com/).

There are also heaps of free proxies out there
ilikelinux (1418)
179600 2003-10-02 08:17:00 > What you are looking for is a proxy.
>

Only if its Win95 or Win98 (Not SE) you're using to dial into the net with :-)

And yes, I'll agree that's a good proxy :D
Chilling_Silently (228)
179601 2003-10-02 10:32:00 a slight thread hijack here......

what is a good FREE proxy that has full socks5 support and profer not to have a web/browser interface?
tweak'e (174)
179602 2003-10-02 13:04:00 Proxy sounds good . I have just successfully set up internet sharing using the MS software in win 98 se . Working well, for web, email and FTP .

Would Proxy have advantages?

One might be the wizards - the process was very messy, did the clients manually which was easy once I discarded wizards .
Waltzzz (3972)
179603 2003-10-02 13:22:00 A Proxy would really only help most home users by providing sped up access to websites like Google.

If ICS is working, you've got most out of your connection already then.

Im actually looking at squid myself at the moment.

Sorry for hijacking this thread yet again, but how would a proxy work with dynamic content pages, like PressF1?

Does it always check that the remote version is newer than the cached one?
Chilling_Silently (228)
179604 2003-10-02 14:42:00 Thanks for replys that really helped... perelini (4629)
179605 2003-10-03 05:16:00 > Sorry for hijacking this thread yet again, but how would a proxy work with dynamic
> content pages, like PressF1?
>
> Does it always check that the remote version is newer than the cached one?

The proxy would check PF1 for newer versions -depending on when depends on either squids default (which is per request from memory) or whenever you tell it you want it to check for newer version AFAIK.
It's just as easy to tell squid not to cache pages with the suffix .jsp, .php, and .asp as you'll remember the fiasco with CF1 and the Paradise proxy.

CyberChuck
cyberchuck (173)
1