| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 128969 | 2013-01-26 00:20:00 | Looking back @ the forum archives | goodiesguy (15316) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1324975 | 2013-01-26 00:20:00 | Have been looking back at the forum archives and have been laughing at some of the comments: When do we get broadband full stop,here in Swannanoa? :( I would hope he has broadband now. A client is using MS Office v.4, which was released around 1994. They have upgraded to Windows 95 and have a copy of Office 95, as yet unloaded. Apart from Word and Excel, the main use is a database in Access (v.2). Data including dates for 2000 will need to be entered from the beginning of 1999. The MS Y2K site states that Office v.4 is not Y2K compliant, but Office 95 is compliant with patches installed. Office 97 is stated to be fully compliant. Another contact has been told by MS NZ that Office 97 is not compliant, and to wait for Office 2000 to be released in March 99 (if this date can be taken as reliable!). This would also require upgrading to Windows 98. Personally I am not too enthusiastic about installing the 95 version with patches. Any comments / suggestions on an effective, safe and reliable solution to this dilemma? Windows 98 won't let me install anymore fonts on my computer. It comes up with a dialog saying that I have too many fonts and I have to delete some to be able to install more. Does windows really have a limit? and is it possible to get around it? Anyone else have any favorites? |
goodiesguy (15316) | ||
| 1324976 | 2013-01-26 07:53:00 | Maybe not any favourites, but when doing research sometimes, the old ones pop up again. Its quite interesting how some same ol problems have been around for years. | wainuitech (129) | ||
| 1324977 | 2013-01-26 09:31:00 | We don't need more than 512MB RAM or was that 4MB. | Nomad (952) | ||
| 1324978 | 2013-01-26 09:49:00 | 640Kb | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1 | |||||