| Post ID |
Timestamp |
Content |
User |
| 183619 |
2003-10-16 06:11:00 |
I can imagine they will only allow "Trusted Computers" on that type of network for consumers in the future. |
PoWa (203) |
| 183620 |
2003-10-16 06:17:00 |
in that case then some sections of the US government cant use it considering the "leak" of some secret agents name... |
csinclair83 (200) |
| 183621 |
2003-10-16 08:19:00 |
I'd luurve to transfer at 5.5gig/sec, but I seem to remember that the speed was achieved under hugely artificial circumstances - I suspect us ordinary mortals are stuck with 56kbits/sec for a while yet (sigh). |
tbacon_nz (865) |
| 183622 |
2003-10-16 08:29:00 |
Along with that you could go for this (www.wired.com) and take over the world before it knew what was going on?????? |
Rod ger (316) |
| 183623 |
2003-10-16 08:40:00 |
needa win lotto a few times to get that much power in a computer...but ohhh the frames per second on any games would just be smoooooth.... |
csinclair83 (200) |
| 183624 |
2003-10-16 09:18:00 |
Its a little expensive but sounds awsome! How can amd and intel compete with that? They should release the chips at about <$2000 and make a killing off them that way. But maybe its so expensive because of the chip's manufacturing process or material -maybe its gold :p. |
PoWa (203) |
| 183625 |
2003-10-16 09:58:00 |
Nah! Their just first, and can corner the market, screw it for what they can get before someone comes up with a different version of the same thing. |
Rod ger (316) |
| 1 2 |
|