| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 40263 | 2003-12-03 02:28:00 | Off Topic: What improvements would you like to see be made to pressf1? | Wilky (776) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 196755 | 2003-12-07 04:58:00 | >And ilike - did you really send Chill 49 e-mails? Shame on you. No Comment. |
ilikelinux (1418) | ||
| 196756 | 2003-12-07 07:31:00 | The forums are instantantaneous for me most of the time. On dialup. I think the ability to tick a "don't display smilies in this post" would be of use. |
-=JM=- (16) | ||
| 196757 | 2003-12-07 07:59:00 | > I think the ability to tick a "don't display smilies in this post" would be of use. All you need do is press G in Opera and all the graphics disappear on the next page load. Can't get any faster than that. ;-) |
Susan B (19) | ||
| 196758 | 2003-12-07 08:39:00 | We need more animated smilies like the ":kill:" one in ChatF1. And another like small section where people can have a argument or sort out each others differences and talk about other stuff rather than hijack another thread. Or an Off Topic section. häzz |
hazza (2704) | ||
| 196759 | 2003-12-07 09:31:00 | Ok, no offence here . . but . . . I'd like to see these type of threads gone . . are they any use? . . . If you want somewhere to have fun, and the rest . . go to a different forum . And instead of posting 50 odd posts to one persons problem, bringing it to the top of the list everytime . . . can we post 10ish posts to every problem Some of the discussion here is just not possible . Be glad we have PF1 . . . yes, new added features would be great, but are they essential for us to survive? These more and more OT threads . . . completely non-revelent, yet people look at them first . . at least I'm sure some do . Can't you perhaps help do some research and learn for yourself too? Some people post such random enquiries, some don't have an answer, while others are so simple even the dog would probably know it . E . G . Who builds this kind of computer . . . well, any one can build it if they wanted to, with the money too! However, I must thank some of our contributors who have remained the traditional PF1 user . . . we truly cannot do without you, these incl . tweak 'e, etc . Too many to name! Also, I've seen some replies that just read . . . have a search on Google, or the manufactures website . Off course! . . one would obviously have been there! Enough said, are we S . . . T . . . I . . . L . . . L . . . . going to post here . . . . ? No intended to cause a flame thread! |
~~~~~ s y ~~~~~ (2054) | ||
| 196760 | 2003-12-07 09:33:00 | > These more and more OT threads... completely > non-revelent, yet people look at them first.. at > least I'm sure some do. Can't you perhaps help do > some research and learn for yourself too? Bad English... There is.. or there's |
~~~~~ s y ~~~~~ (2054) | ||
| 196761 | 2003-12-07 09:51:00 | > > I think the ability to tick a "don't display > smilies in this post" would be of use. > > All you need do is press G in Opera and all the > graphics disappear on the next page load. Can't get > any faster than that. ;-) How the heck does that help Susan? I don't see how that will disable the smilies in one post I make to prevent emoticons showing in a piece of code which gains accidental smilies. |
-=JM=- (16) | ||
| 196762 | 2003-12-07 10:57:00 | Oh, sy, so stern and conservative for one so young. And what is a ''traditional PF1 user''? One person`s random is another`s smiley I think. Well done on the proof reading. | brewer (4389) | ||
| 196763 | 2003-12-07 19:30:00 | > How the heck does that help Susan? I don't see how > that will disable the smilies in one post I make to > prevent emoticons showing in a piece of code which > gains accidental smilies . Well you posted something about speeding things up in the same post as disabling smilies so I presumed you were talking about disabling them to make the page load faster hence my suggestion for disabling the graphics altogether . Sorry I spoke . :-( |
Susan B (19) | ||
| 196764 | 2003-12-07 21:42:00 | ah. that would explain it. | -=JM=- (16) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | |||||