| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 40394 | 2003-12-06 23:17:00 | Ram Speeds | Craig (448) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 197982 | 2003-12-06 23:17:00 | Is there a significant performance difference between 266Mhz and 400Mhz RAM? If there is, which would be your preferred - 1024Mb 266Mhz or 512Mb 400Mhz? |
Craig (448) | ||
| 197983 | 2003-12-07 00:08:00 | can your motherboard run the ram 400mhz?? if so use the 400. | tweak'e (174) | ||
| 197984 | 2003-12-07 01:19:00 | I'm looking at buying a computer for myself, as currently I use my 'family' one, which is only a couple of months old, but I'd like to have my own. So I was seeing if it would be better to go for the setup with higher rate ram and less of it, or lower rate ram with more of it. But I guess it's better to go for the better quality setup and then in the future it has the ability for upgrade. Now all I need to do is save the money, which is hard to do when your a sixteen year old without a job! Anyone in Tauranga want to employ me??? :) |
Craig (448) | ||
| 197985 | 2003-12-07 01:44:00 | well I'd just about guarantee that my system which has 512mb pc3200 DDR ram (400mHZ) runnign as dual channel will be a LOT faster than a 266Mhz setup running NON dual ram........... | drcspy (146) | ||
| 197986 | 2003-12-07 02:31:00 | 512meg is ample size for most things. you could even get away with 256meg for medium tasks, so go with the faster ram. | tweak'e (174) | ||
| 1 | |||||