| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 41226 | 2004-01-03 23:43:00 | 3dmark 2003 | Mark Veldhuizen (2570) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 205149 | 2004-01-04 00:42:00 | It'd be your Celeron that's stopping you from getting anything higher - although 4000 is still a respectable score. | Mark Veldhuizen (2570) | ||
| 205150 | 2004-01-04 01:00:00 | > > How much did you overclock the video card, as you > scored a clean 1,500 3dmarks more than me with just a > gf4ti (you didn't name which one, either)? Leadtek g4ti4200. No idea how much i overclocked it,Although it cant have been extreme as i didnt have any defects happening on screen. |
metla (154) | ||
| 205151 | 2004-01-04 01:04:00 | Woohoo well just hit 5343, set the drivers to performance and overclocked the core clock frequency and memory clck frequency of my g/card by 20% Res was 1024x768 32 bit colour @ 60Hz Now I wonder if overclock my CPU more if it will gimme more power.....hehehehehehe hahahahahahahahah :) cheers chiefnz |
chiefnz (545) | ||
| 205152 | 2004-01-04 01:20:00 | Okay just hit 7245 3D marks... 640x480, g/card overclocked 20% again. I think maybe its time for an g/card upgrade. Anyone wana buy my GeForce FX 5200? cheers chiefnz |
chiefnz (545) | ||
| 205153 | 2004-01-04 01:31:00 | Ok I can't overclock the Celeron more than the 200Mhz I have it on now. I went up to 2.89Ghz but my machine kept restarting.... oh well looks like I may need to get a new CPU and g/card.... :( cheers chiefnz |
chiefnz (545) | ||
| 205154 | 2004-01-04 05:45:00 | Geforce 4 Ti's just about always beat out ATI Radeon 9500/9600's in 3D Mark 2001. Its just the way it is, the Radeon 9500/9600 have never been at there strongest in pre DX9.0 programs. Although you will find if you use a DX9.0 benchmark such as Halflife 2 or Aquamark then the Radeon will take the Geforce 4 to bits | Pete O'Neil (250) | ||
| 205155 | 2004-01-04 10:15:00 | Bullocks. | metla (154) | ||
| 205156 | 2004-01-04 21:04:00 | I think you'll find your wrong melta, i have had personal experience with both cards and honestly say that the Ti's out preform Radeon 9500/9600 in 3D Mark 2001. Before i provide links to back up my claims can we assume that the 9500 outpreforms the 9600 or do i have to provide links to prove this aswell? www.techsmart.co.za www20.tomshardware.com www.hothardware.com(2).shtml would you like some more sites or is that enough? What they show is that when running 3D Mark 2001SE at defualt settings the Ti4600 easily beats a 9500, a Ti4400 is roughly on par with a 9500, and that a Ti4200 is only around 500 marks behind. |
Pete O'Neil (250) | ||
| 205157 | 2004-01-04 21:11:00 | Yep,Your quite correct. However,once you do some overclocking or enable AA the ATI cards spank the nvidia's. Plus the fact that the g4 series don't suport dx9... Meh...i got nothing... And yeah,i do know the 9500 pro outperforms the 9600pro,no need for links. |
metla (154) | ||
| 205158 | 2004-01-04 21:46:00 | > However,once you do some overclocking or enable AA > the ATI cards spank the nvidia's. > > Plus the fact that the g4 series don't suport dx9... agreed |
Pete O'Neil (250) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||