Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 41299 2004-01-06 04:51:00 Digital Camera, What to buy Will Hunt (3655) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
205636 2004-01-07 05:38:00 When I last went to Wanganui it didn't look like a bomb site.

What have you done to it?

Good camera BTW. :-)
Elephant (599)
205637 2004-01-07 05:42:00 My S602Z has an "Optical - LCD" viewfinder, which operates in a similar manner to a full SLR.

Its a very hi-res LCD, and you dont think about the fact its an LCD you are looking at to be honest. Only when you get a momentary "freeze" (programmable on/off) of the actual photo after you press the shutter do you think about it.

Its quite good, as you are truly looking through the lens in this manner.
godfather (25)
205638 2004-01-07 06:41:00 Well its deffinetly not my place......:p

but good photo Metla....


beetle
beetle (243)
205639 2004-01-07 08:20:00 > Now Graham, you know we don't allow advertising on
> PressF1 :8} .
> robo.


Took me awhile to find it but I thought it had been mentioned here previously:
pressf1.pcworld.co.nz
;-)


BTW deleting those old buildings is a crime. someone should be shot for that. :-(
Fire-and-Ice (3910)
205640 2004-01-07 08:26:00 A crime?
Someone should be shot?


The building was ruined,There was no other viable option,If the demolition had been stopped then that building would have continued to rot untill it collapsed.

Theres a much bigger picture out there then just people who aern't involved or possesing any of the facts to make statements such as that.

Nice use of the word deleting though.
metla (154)
205641 2004-01-07 09:00:00 Its a pity the building was allowed to go to ruin in the first place . You ever been to Dunedin? There may be other places around the country but I know of none in NZ that have so many beautiful old buildings in excellent condition . There are untold numbers of dwellings and business buildings built in the late 1800's/early 1900's that add so much character to that wonderful city and its a damn shame that the rest of the country cant follow Dunedin's example . Restoration might be costly, particularly when left too late but once those buildings are gone there is no bringing them back . Society has too much of a disposable rather than recylable mind set these days unfortunately .

Sorry for the off topic . ;-)
Fire-and-Ice (3910)
205642 2004-01-07 09:44:00 Are you Mike's brother? cappuccino (1800)
205643 2004-01-07 09:58:00 > Are you Mike's brother?


Is that question for me?
metla (154)
205644 2004-01-07 17:24:00 No Metla, it was a question for Will Hunt.

I believe his brother Mike is well known to a lot of ladies.
cappuccino (1800)
205645 2004-01-08 01:34:00 Perhaps I should have said "a viewfinder which you use by looking through an eyepiece while holding the camera up against your face rather than looking at a screen with the camera held out in front of you at your focal length" . B-) I find that it is easier to hold the camera steady this way . "Optical finder": is easier to write, too . ;-) An "optical" finder such as GF's would be nice . . . it gets around the parallax problem perfectly --- you are seeing what the sensor is seeing . Big money will get you a true SLR digital camera .

I suppose some of the LCD panels which can be "twisted" could be used like a waistlevel finder . :D
Graham L (2)
1 2 3 4