Forum Home
Press F1
Thread ID: 41613	2004-01-16 09:41:00	WFTWE #85....Deosculate....Parental Advisory: R18 Rating.....	Billy T (70)	Press F1

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
207890	2004-01-16 09:41:00	Deosculate Deosculate: To kiss affectionately Deosculation induces violent reactions from pre and early teens, especially where parents are involved, and within the view of peers! Cheers Billy 8-{) :D Sorry I'm late tonight folks, demands of work I'm afraid plus a slow news day, with nothing to inspire.:|	Billy T (70)
207891	2004-01-16 11:26:00	Hi Billy. I am way past the pre or early teens age and heading for the fossil state, but Deosculation from in-laws and close family gives me thoughts of violent reaction. Luckily I usually manage to constrain myself by turning away and mumbling something like "don't do that, I might catch something ". What's more, I usually get away with it too. :) One thing I can't figure out is why people pucker their lips as if to kiss one on the cheek then place their cheek against yours without actually kissing. It sure makes more sense, when it is only a greeting anyway, but why pucker the lips and kiss the air? From the above I guess I can be classed as a Philematophobe as per your WFTWE exactly one year ago today. [ Philematophobe: One who dislikes kissing. Posted: Jan 17, 2003 9:01 PM] Cheers, :x :x :x , exLL :D	exLL (515)
207892	2004-01-16 12:01:00	Oh dear . How sad . . . I send my sympathy to Mrs exLL for what she's been missing through lack of deosculation - unless she also has philematophobic fears about "catching something?" In that case, you have a true marriage of minds - and who cares whether in-laws get kissed or not?	Laura (43)
207893	2004-01-16 19:01:00	How does deosculate compare with osculate in meaning? I knew that osculate meant to kiss, perhaps deosculate is more passionate? Osculate is also a maths expression meaning having points in common :)	Terry Porritt (14)
207894	2004-01-17 13:44:00	No Terry, I didn't know that osculate was a maths expression (being very limited at maths), but would certainly agree that kissing requires having several points in common...and if done properly, the more points the better. Like you, I wonder whether deosculation requires more passion. Billy T will have to tell us his source for deciding that. Hopefully, the longer the word, the longer the kiss... Equally I wonder why a weekend fun discussion on kissing attracts comments from only those obviously past their first experiments in these things. So are are the PF1 younger members shy - or are they out in the weekend practising such things? Or are they (horror of horrors) sitting in front of their computers, believing the Web is the real world? Sadly,a computer doesn't give you any sort of osculation.	Laura (43)
207895	2004-01-17 19:01:00	Maybe Laura, it's that modern music is not very conducive to osculatory behaviour. Where as my brand of music was all about love, and what one could do on the back porch, or in the moonlight, or even, horror of horrors being 'busy in the Lizzie". Lizzie refering to the Ford 'Tin Lizzie' :)	Terry Porritt (14)
207896	2004-01-17 23:35:00	Well........:| If we take the "society" hit-or-miss kiss, that is marked by a total absence of passion (or sincerity). Thinking further, while we may hold passionate feelings about our children or our relatives, passion is not something society would normally associate with an exchange of kisses in that context, though one may suppress the occasional passionate desire to strangle one's offspring or immediate relatives. So, IMHO deosculation is a passion-free experience. On the other hand, osculation (the word) is shorter, leaving more time and energy for the passionate embrace that hopefully will follow osculatory thoughts. Personally though, I subscribe to the KISS principle, which dispenses with uneccessary verbiage and gets down to the business without delay. :x Cheers Billy 8-{) :D	Billy T (70)
1