Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 42728 2004-02-20 18:17:00 LCD Monitors SpiderVenom (1412) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
216921 2004-02-20 18:17:00 I've decided to go LCD shopping (something I swore I'd never do - "They're inferior to CRTs!" - amazing what eyestrain can drive you to :P).

Can anyone give me advice on the Samsung Syncmaster 152X 15"?

Thanks
SpiderVenom (1412)
216922 2004-02-20 18:38:00 Have no experience with that one. Philips are pretty good.
They are so cheap now.
There is a hot pixel test out there that you should run as soon as you buy to make sure you don't have a dud.
robo.
robo (205)
216923 2004-02-20 19:08:00 dvi port?

if i had i would get a mac dvi-adc (apple display connector) converter, and get one of those big, beautiful 23" apple screens (yes on my xp box :p). then my life would be complete...

but i use viewsonic lcd screens @ high school, and they are good.
Megaman (344)
216924 2004-02-20 23:15:00 > There is a hot pixel test out there that you should
> run as soon as you buy to make sure you don't have a
> dud.


Where to get this 'hot pixel test'? Or is it a 'built-in' utility?
bk T (215)
216925 2004-02-21 00:51:00 BUMP

im interested in this hot pixel test as well.

Though i spose i could have looked it up on google and found the info in the time it took to write this post....
metla (154)
216926 2004-02-22 18:23:00 Has anyone had any experience with the ViewSonic VE500? SpiderVenom (1412)
216927 2004-02-22 19:17:00 >There is a hot pixel test out there that you should run as soon as you buy to make sure you don't have a dud.

In fact, you may need to run it before you buy. Most of the cheaper LCDs allow a certain number of bad pixels before they are subject to warranty / replacement. If you get home with a display and find it has an annoying dead / bright pixel, you might find you have no comeback.

There is even a standard (ISO 13406-2 ) that describes how many and their relative location, bad pixels are allowable for a given size display.

You can however pay more for a "zero bad" display, which will guarantee no bad pixels. :|
wuppo (41)
216928 2004-02-22 20:03:00 > You can however pay more for a "zero bad" display,
> which will guarantee no bad pixels . :|

The Philips business range have a zero stuck or dead pixel guarrantee . You can expect to pay about $75-100 more for them than the consumer/home monitors .

A DVI port would be nice as well if your graphics card has one to connect to .

Cheers Murray P
Murray P (44)
216929 2004-02-22 21:15:00 So a DVI connector would be worth it then? My card does have one (a Radeon 9500 Pro, although thanks to a little BIOS hacking, windows swears it's a 9700 Pro :P). Given all this, does anyone have some recomendations for these requirements:

$700-$1000 (inc GST :P)
15inch
sub 20ms response time
SpiderVenom (1412)
216930 2004-02-22 22:18:00 > Given all this, does anyone have some
> recomendations for these requirements:
>
> $700-$1000 (inc GST :P)
> 15inch
> sub 20ms response time

I would recommend the Philips 170B4 (www.lcdmonitors.philips.com) 17" LCD - it is within your price range (www.pricespy.co.nz). It doesn't have a sub 20ms response time but I haven't noticed any problems with fast paced graphics on it. It has a wide viewing angle (screen retains its viewability from a wide range of angles) and the colour eveness/depth is great.

The Philips 170B4 is the business model, which means it is one level up from the standard entry model, and has a zero dead/fixed pixel policy, and both a DVI-D and analog connection. You will need to order your DVI cable separately as it doesn't come with the monitor. Since the Philips model uses DVI-D and your card probably uses DVI-I, you will need to get a DVI-D to DVI-D (male to male) cable as a DVI-I to DVI-I cable will not fit the monitor's D connection.
Jen C (20)
1 2