| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 42978 | 2004-02-28 08:04:00 | Athlon 64 3200 vs P4 3.2GHz | infinix (5274) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 218829 | 2004-02-29 01:45:00 | Yes AMD 64 3200+ beats P4 3.2 ghz. AMD 3200+ beats P4 3.2 ghz. and AMD64 3200+ just beats AMD 3200+. So order of ranking. 1. AMD 64 3200+ 2. AMD 3200+ 3. P4 3.2 ghz I say these things based on benchmarks me and my friends have run at the computer shop where we work. Based on reviews found everywhere on the internet. |
Chao is back (634) | ||
| 218830 | 2004-02-29 04:08:00 | > I have heard that the new Intel Prescott wont be > compatible with current P4 motherboards, and so that > the possibility of upgrading after the 3.2 is > unlikely. Not that that really concerns me. The new Asus P4S800MX supports the Intel Prescott, as well as the current HT processors. Newly release, but look at the price in Price Spy. Only $99+GST I'm beginning to think theres something wrong... But yes.... blame it all on the price war if you're fussy. Personally I perfer them cheaper, don't you? :D |
~~~~~ s y ~~~~~ (2054) | ||
| 218831 | 2004-02-29 04:10:00 | was just trying to keep it relevent to the cpu's the thread started asked about old chap. | metla (154) | ||
| 218832 | 2004-02-29 11:50:00 | Yes.. Well... I did read the thread and gave my opinion for what it may be worth. I certainly don't want to start an arguement with you. I won't be buying an AMD 64 bit CPU anytime soon either. Reason is that I have no intention of changing my operating system either. |
Elephant (599) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||