Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 44562 2004-04-23 02:51:00 P4 or AMD dwnz2003 (5250) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
231417 2004-04-26 04:26:00 Just one question about the speed aspect...
"What the hell are you going to do in the two nano seconds that one processor may be faster than the other one by?"
oggy (1250)
231418 2004-04-26 04:46:00 whetu is right on the money here. the motherboard is far more important than the cpu. get a good motherboard even if it means buying a cheaper cpu.

basicly go find one that has the features you need (eg 800mhz fsb, 8x agp etc) and find the most reliable/fastest/beat one. if you find that no-one makes a good board for the cpu you had in mind then get a lower spec cpu. this has happened before and the trade off is well worth it.

how many times have we seen on this forum where people have had big fast cpu pc's that run at snails pace and/or are crash happy.
tweak'e (174)
231419 2004-04-26 05:28:00 I'm with whetu here, a more reasoned and cogent argument I have rarely seen. In fact whetu, you have laid the foundation for my next computer which is just entering the planning stages.

I know exactly what I want (and need) to do with it, so I'll sort the MB first then find a matching CPU.

Strip out the emotion, the prejudice and the conspiracy theories and get back to simple facts, then choose according to your needs, not the label on the CPU. That smacks of Holden VS Ford.

Cheers

Billy 8-{)
Billy T (70)
231420 2004-04-26 05:38:00 Your all talking like there will be only one motherboard availble with everything you need so that will dictate the cpu.

Doesn't make any sence to me,Motherboards are available in hundreds of configuerations and made by dozens of manufacters.Lay down the specs for the componets based on budget and purpose then use a motherboard that fits the required task.

Provided you use a motherboard that enables the cpu to run at its full potential then their shouldn't be any issue(and you would be an idiot to buy one that didn't),You have to line up all the specs of all the components.
metla (154)
231421 2004-04-26 05:42:00 I tend to choose the base configurations first then try find a motherboard to fit all the stuff. However I can understand why one would want to go motherboard first. Using the mobo as the "foundation base" can be quite sensible too at times...

I have gone looking for things at the same time, trying to find a motherboard that would fit the CPU and vice-versa at the same time. Beat that ;-)
~~~~~ s y ~~~~~ (2054)
231422 2004-04-26 05:45:00 Only problem been, I ended up with an awesome nForce (AMD type) motherboard, only to find that the CPU I had chosen was Intel. About time Intel brought some decent onboard graphics things before I become a traitor.... not so long, considering I'm looking to another computer in the next few months... ~~~~~ s y ~~~~~ (2054)
231423 2004-04-26 06:12:00 if i build a computer i would have in mind wht type of cpu i was going to use because as i said last time you need to now, because you may buy a amd cpu and find out that your motherboard need's a Intel CPU. WHY would you choose a MB first? dwnz2003 (5250)
231424 2004-04-26 06:19:00 > if i build a computer i would have in mind wht type
> of cpu i was going to use because as i said last time
> you need to now, because you may buy a amd cpu and
> find out that your motherboard need's a Intel CPU.
> WHY would you choose a MB first?


They have allready explained their thinking quite clearly,it doesn't fit in with my component desicions but i doubt they/he will explain the concept again when you clearly missed it the first time.
metla (154)
231425 2004-04-26 06:20:00 Well my question was wht CPU was faster not which way to choose hardware for a system. dwnz2003 (5250)
231426 2004-04-26 06:21:00 Very true and their answer was choose a cpu that fits the intended motherboard.

Lmao.
metla (154)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9