| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 45338 | 2004-05-19 01:56:00 | Swain nixed unbundling as expected | juha (761) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 237656 | 2004-05-19 01:56:00 | Yes, Telecom NZ will continue to enjoy being shielded from competition. Not that there was ever any doubt what Swain would decide of course. -- Juha |
juha (761) | ||
| 237657 | 2004-05-19 02:20:00 | Yep, all the signs were there but, ?:| :_| all the same. Cheers Murray P |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 237658 | 2004-05-19 02:34:00 | I thought Swain would at least ask Telecom to improve on the pathetic wholesale deal, but no, not even that . -- Juha |
juha (761) | ||
| 237659 | 2004-05-19 02:48:00 | Gah... we might as well revoke electricity and slump back into a complete 3rd world arrangement. | whiskeytangofoxtrot (438) | ||
| 237660 | 2004-05-19 03:51:00 | > Yes, Telecom NZ will continue to enjoy being shielded > from competition. > > Not that there was ever any doubt what Swain would > decide of course. do you have a link to that news story? |
stu120404 (268) | ||
| 237661 | 2004-05-19 04:39:00 | computerworld.co.nz snipurl.com |
juha (761) | ||
| 237662 | 2004-05-19 05:50:00 | I just don't get it. "this is the decision that has the potential to quickly promote more competition in the long term interests of consumers," Mr Swain said." yeah, sure, because 256k/128k is all anyone will ever need!?! so much for the knowledge ripple... |
_mike_ (4814) | ||
| 237663 | 2004-05-19 23:56:00 | did any one seen Holmes last night? | stu120404 (268) | ||
| 237664 | 2004-05-20 00:38:00 | > did any one seen Holmes last night? I'm sure someone watched it stu. What did the great one say? Cheers Murray P |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 237665 | 2004-05-20 07:59:00 | Thats the thing I especially don't understand with this decision . . . ok ok so they didn't unbundle which is a shame/illogical in itself . . . but why only mandate a minumum of 256k bitstream access??? It is all Telecom will provide . . . Purposely leaving New Zealand consumers in the SLOW lane . It is blatantly stupid . |
daskip (5243) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||