| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 51824 | 2004-11-30 21:28:00 | Wireless Encryption mentioned in PCW | Chilling_Silence (9) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 298402 | 2004-12-02 06:30:00 | > There will never be a _direct_ connection... run mtr > on Google.co.nz and it goes through a good 7 or 8 > connections before it gets there. never is a strong word chill. Tracing route to jgi.co.nz [10.0.0.80] from 10.2.0.16 over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.0.0.80 Trace complete. |
george12 (7) | ||
| 298403 | 2004-12-02 06:43:00 | > And yes, Murray, I was meaning "you" as in you and me > and the rest of the world in general :-) Oh goody, thousands will sleep peacefully tonight knowing that :p Yup locks are for honest people, which doesn't include guvmints and the likes of the entities Graham mentioned, but inviting people in whether you want to or not is a bit too magnanimous. |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 298404 | 2004-12-02 07:08:00 | george12: I can do the same with my website (www.dimension.net.nz) - But we're talking internet transmissions here dude.... I do that and get about 8 between me and there.... Admittedly I do PC <-> PC transfers encrypted now via ssh ;-) Instant Messaging is also encrypted with those that matter using Gaim-encyption too! This world has a false sense of security when it comes to the internet..... Murray: Inviting who?? |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 298405 | 2004-12-02 08:10:00 | Yeah - while we're on the topic of routes: Can anybody explain this? - Tracing route to dimension.net.nz [202.89.35.251] from 10.2.0.17 over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router1.jgi.co.nz [10.0.0.254] 2 82 ms 93 ms 83 ms 210-55-64-32.adsl.netgate.net.nz [210.55.64.32] 3 82 ms 79 ms 85 ms 192.168.253.1 <---- LOCAL ADDRESS!!!!! 4 65 ms 65 ms 67 ms 202.50.119.153 5 64 ms 71 ms 73 ms a3-0-5.tkcr1.global-gateway.net.nz [202.50.245.106] 6 82 ms 97 ms 95 ms webinternet-dom.tkcr1.global-gateway.net.nz [202.37.246.218] 7 90 ms 81 ms 79 ms fa0-0-0-23.cr01.akl1.maxnet.net.nz [202.89.36.11] 8 88 ms 85 ms 89 ms fa0-0-1-21.ar01.akl1.maxnet.net.nz [202.89.36.21] 9 95 ms 97 ms 93 ms babylon.blakjak.net [202.89.35.251] Trace complete. Now why on earth would there be a 192.168.x.x in the middle of an internet route? It pings fine too. But isn't it meant to be private???:| |
george12 (7) | ||
| 298406 | 2004-12-02 08:58:00 | I think you'll find it'll be different if you ping: ftp.dimension.net.nz ssh.dimension.net.nz irc.dimension.net.nz dyn.dimension.net.nz www.dimension.net.nz ^^ Those are me - Otherwise Ive got pure dimension.net.nz going to a mates place where he's got slightly tighter security than me ;-) |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 298407 | 2004-12-02 09:25:00 | > Murray: Inviting who?? Guys in cars with laptops *cough* or grateful, but parsimonious neighbours ;) |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 298408 | 2004-12-02 09:27:00 | Ah yes, BUT in my understanding, private ranges such as 192.168.x.x are unroutable - therefore I would not expect such IP addresses to be smack-bang in the MIDDLE of a traceroute - let alone being able to ping from a 10.x.x.x network to the middle of the internet. How is such a thing possible? BTW it is long before the destination, about hop 6 out of 9. |
george12 (7) | ||
| 298409 | 2004-12-02 22:18:00 | george12> How do you do a Trace route in windows xp?, as I will try the same trace as you & see if I get the same thing or not :) | stu120404 (268) | ||
| 298410 | 2004-12-02 22:28:00 | Start -> Run -> "cmd" -> [Enter] Type: tracert Cheers |
george12 (7) | ||
| 298411 | 2004-12-02 22:30:00 | Erm. Dumb me. >tracert www.dimension.net.nz I get the 192.168.253.1 address on the third hop (2nd not counting my router). |
george12 (7) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||