| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 52950 | 2005-01-03 10:37:00 | For everyone that uses Firefox | Codex (3761) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 310233 | 2005-01-03 12:32:00 | and metla: what?? My thoughts exactly. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 310234 | 2005-01-03 12:48:00 | ummmm youve lost me completely what are you talking bout im like in dream land here.....with strawberries.....mmmmmmmm.....wait off topic...umm yea wat?? | Codex (3761) | ||
| 310235 | 2005-01-03 19:41:00 | Codex, is it worthwhile for those of us who do not have broadband (i.e. dial up)? Thanks. |
Strommer (42) | ||
| 310236 | 2005-01-03 20:48:00 | It seems I can modify those values in Netscape too, but anyone know if it'll work, or will it make things screwy? | Greg (193) | ||
| 310237 | 2005-01-04 00:14:00 | Steve_L. I gather it can make more of a difference on dialup. The only problem with it is that some web servers only allow a certain number of total connections so this method can limit the number of people connecting to a site at one time. | mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 310238 | 2005-01-04 00:53:00 | Codex, is it worthwhile for those of us who do not have broadband (i.e. dial up)? Thanks. ummm i dont know but im going to do it to my dial up pcs anyway, |
Codex (3761) | ||
| 310239 | 2005-01-04 00:57:00 | No point in applying these changes if your using dialup. | Murray P (44) | ||
| 310240 | 2005-01-04 01:13:00 | isn't the pipelining the same method used by download managers (split it into parts)? | Edward (31) | ||
| 310241 | 2005-01-04 01:15:00 | No point in applying these changes if your using dialup. why not? |
sambaird (47) | ||
| 310242 | 2005-01-04 02:57:00 | Enabling more than the default number of four connections for pipelining if you use dial-up would be ridiculous. I already have pipelining enabled on a dial-up connection, but adding that nglayout setting made Firefox go spastic. Not only did it lose the setting, but it enabled the update icon, which I had disabled. |
agent (30) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||