| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 135848 | 2013-12-18 05:43:00 | Foxit vs Nitro | Nick G (16709) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1362976 | 2013-12-18 23:32:00 | www.nitropdf.com Download reader :) |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1362977 | 2013-12-19 00:31:00 | Just got it - seems better featured than Foxit. | Greg (193) | ||
| 1362978 | 2013-12-19 01:14:00 | I use Sumatrapdf for opening PDF files. And Foxit for editing them | Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 1362979 | 2013-12-19 02:40:00 | It's also worth remembering / mentioning that Firefox has a built-in PDF viewer now (no external programs required). True, but I find it very resource-intensive, especially if you open multiple files at once or if you open something graphics-heavy (or even with just lots of text in tables or such!) |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 1362980 | 2013-12-19 04:40:00 | "I use Sumatrapdf for opening PDF files. And Foxit for editing them" Same here. |
zqwerty (97) | ||
| 1362981 | 2013-12-19 07:11:00 | I changed from Foxit to Sumatra and then to Nitro, which beats both of the other two hands down BUT Nitro takes a lot longer to start than Sumatra does. This may be because it always tries to "phone home" when opened. Preventing net access with my firewall shaves a second or two off the time but it is still noticeably slower to open than Sumatra. Anyone else notice this or is it just me? | FoxyMX (5) | ||
| 1362982 | 2013-12-19 07:54:00 | I changed from Foxit to Sumatra and then to Nitro, which beats both of the other two hands down BUT Nitro takes a lot longer to start than Sumatra does. This may be because it always tries to "phone home" when opened. Preventing net access with my firewall shaves a second or two off the time but it is still noticeably slower to open than Sumatra. Anyone else notice this or is it just me? Yep, I find it quite slow to open as well. |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||