Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 150115 2021-09-09 10:39:00 New superconducting magnet breaks magnetic field strength records zqwerty (97) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1480407 2021-09-09 10:39:00 New superconducting magnet breaks magnetic field strength records, paving the way for fusion energy:

We've heard it all before but this looks promising:

phys.org

If we can make reliable fusion reactors economically then our future looks a lot brighter.

I've been following the development of fusion reactors for 40 years and today, 9th September 2021, I feel slightly more optimistic than ever before.
zqwerty (97)
1480408 2021-09-09 19:43:00 Same here, have you checked out Thorium reactors? They sound interesting. Trouble is same as fusion... developing it commercially. Once they make the breakthrough we are a lot better off.

Ken
kenj (9738)
1480409 2021-09-09 23:18:00 Current test fusion reactors take so much energy to run , I doubt they will get much excess energy back even when they crack it .
They may simply be uneconomic .

Thorium reactors were never originally developed because they cant produce the Plutonium needed for Nuke Bombs .
Thorium Reactors do still produce dangerous nuclear waste , thats something many counties are trying to move away from .

www.theguardian.com
"Thorium cannot in itself power a reactor; unlike natural uranium, it does not contain enough fissile material to initiate a nuclear chain reaction. As a result it must first be bombarded with neutrons to produce the highly radioactive isotope uranium-233 – 'so these are really U-233 reactors"
"This isotope is more hazardous than the U-235 used in conventional reactors, he adds, because it produces U-232 as a side effect (half life: 160,000 years), on top of familiar fission by-products such as technetium-99 (half life: up to 300,000 years) and iodine-129 (half life: 15.7 million years).Add in actinides such as protactinium-231 (half life: 33,000 years) and it soon becomes apparent that thorium's superficial cleanliness will still depend on digging some pretty deep holes to bury the highly radioactive waste. "
1101 (13337)
1